Contraceptive Use Among Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancy in the Context of Public Health Emergencies — United States, 2016

Ensuring access to and promoting use of effective contraception have been identified as important strategies for preventing unintended pregnancy (1). The importance of ensuring resources to prevent unintended pregnancy in the context of public health emergencies was highlighted during the 2016 Zika virus outbreak when Zika virus infection during pregnancy was identified as a cause of serious birth defects (2). Accordingly, CDC outlined strategies for state, local, and territorial jurisdictions to consider implementing to ensure access to contraception (3). To update previously published contraceptive use estimates* among women at risk for unintended pregnancy† and to estimate the number of women with ongoing or potential need for contraceptive services,§,¶ data on contraceptive use were collected during September–December 2016 through the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Results from 21 jurisdictions indicated that most women aged 18–49 years were at risk for unintended pregnancy (range across jurisdictions = 57.4%–76.8%). Estimates of the number of women with ongoing or potential need for contraceptive services ranged from 368 to 617 per 1,000 women aged 18–49 years. The percentage of women at risk for unintended pregnancy using a most or moderately effective contraceptive method** ranged from 26.1% to 65.7%. Jurisdictions can use this information to estimate the number of women who might seek contraceptive services and to plan and evaluate efforts to increase contraceptive use. This information is particularly important in the context of public health emergencies, such as the recent Zika virus outbreak, which have been associated with increased risk for adverse maternal-infant outcomes (2,4–6) and have highlighted the importance of providing women and their partners with resources to prevent unintended pregnancy.

[1]  Meghan T. Frey,et al.  Meeting Summary: State and Local Implementation Strategies for Increasing Access to Contraception During Zika Preparedness and Response — United States, September 2016 , 2017, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[2]  Jean Y. Ko,et al.  CDC Grand Rounds: Public Health Strategies to Prevent Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome , 2017, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[3]  Susheela Singh,et al.  Contraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth , 2017, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[4]  Meghan T. Frey,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of Increasing Access to Contraception during the Zika Virus Outbreak, Puerto Rico, 2016 , 2017, Emerging infectious diseases.

[5]  C. Kroelinger,et al.  Importance of Performance Measurement and MCH Epidemiology Leadership to Quality Improvement Initiatives at the National, State and Local Levels , 2016, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[6]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Zika Virus and Birth Defects--Reviewing the Evidence for Causality. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  J. Frost,et al.  Return on Investment: A Fuller Assessment of the Benefits and Cost Savings of the US Publicly Funded Family Planning Program , 2014, The Milbank quarterly.

[8]  K. Curtis,et al.  Contraceptive availability during an emergency response in the United States. , 2013, Journal of women's health.

[9]  L. Finer,et al.  Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level. , 2011, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[10]  W. Callaghan,et al.  Health Concerns of Women and Infants in Times of Natural Disasters: Lessons Learned from Hurricane Katrina , 2007, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[11]  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices , 2017 .