The status of spacecraft bus and platform technology development under the NASA ISPT program

The In-Space Propulsion Technology (ISPT) program is developing spacecraft bus and platform technologies that will enable or enhance NASA robotic science missions. The ISPT program is currently developing technology in four areas that include Propulsion System Technologies (electric and chemical), Entry Vehicle Technologies (aerocapture and Earth entry vehicles), Spacecraft Bus and Sample Return Propulsion Technologies (components and ascent vehicles), and Systems/Mission Analysis. Three technologies are ready for near-term flight infusion: 1) the high-temperature Advanced Material Bipropellant Rocket (AMBR) engine providing higher performance; 2) NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) ion propulsion system, a 0.6-7 kW throttle-able gridded ion system; and 3) Aerocapture technology development with investments in a family of thermal protection system (TPS) materials and structures; guidance, navigation, and control (GN&C) models of blunt-body rigid aeroshells; and aerothermal effect models. Two component technologies being developed with flight infusion in mind are the Advanced Xenon Flow Control System and ultra-lightweight propellant tank technologies. Future directions for ISPT are technologies that relate to sample return missions and other spacecraft bus technology needs like: 1) Mars Ascent Vehicles (MAV); 2) multi-mission technologies for Earth Entry Vehicles (MMEEV); and 3) electric propulsion. These technologies are more vehicles and mission-focused, and present a different set of technology development and infusion steps beyond those previously implemented. The Systems/Mission Analysis area is focused on developing tools and assessing the application of propulsion and spacecraft bus technologies to a wide variety of mission concepts. These in-space propulsion technologies are applicable, and potentially enabling for future NASA Discovery, New Frontiers, and sample return missions currently under consideration, as well as having broad applicability to potential Flagship missions. This paper provides a brief overview of the ISPT program, describing the development status and technology infusion readiness of in-space propulsion technologies in the areas of electric propulsion, Aerocapture, Earth entry vehicles, propulsion components, Mars ascent vehicle, and mission/systems analysis.

[1]  Hani Kamhawi,et al.  In-Space Propulsion High Voltage Hall Accelerator Development Project Overview , 2009 .

[2]  J. W. Dankanich,et al.  Mars Ascent Vehicle development status , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[3]  John W. Dankanich,et al.  Interplanetary Electric Propulsion Uranus Mission Trades Supporting the Decadal Survey , 2011 .

[4]  Alec D. Gallimore,et al.  Real-Tme Boron Nitride Erosion Measurements of the HiVHAc Thruster via Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy , 2013 .

[5]  Peter Stoltz,et al.  Dynamic Electric Field Calculations Using a Fully Kinetic Ion Thruster Discharge Chamber Model , 2010 .

[6]  David J. Anderson,et al.  In-Space Propulsion Technology products ready for infusion on NASA's future science missions , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[7]  Hani Kamhawi,et al.  Effect of Background Pressure on the Performance and Plume of the HiVHAc Hall Thruster , 2013 .

[8]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Spatially-Resolved Beam Current and Charge-State Distributions for the NEXT Ion Engine , 2010 .

[9]  Louis J. Glaab,et al.  Uniform Foam Crush Testing for Multi-Mission Earth Entry Vehicle Impact Attenuation , 2012 .

[10]  John Dankanich,et al.  NASA In-Space advanced chemical propulsion development in recent years , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[11]  Sudhakar Mahalingam,et al.  Particle Based Plasma Simulation for an Ion Engine Discharge Chamber , 2010 .

[12]  Hani Kamhawi,et al.  Advanced Xenon Feed System (AXFS) Development and Hot-fire Testing , 2009 .

[13]  Hani Kamhawi,et al.  Overview of the Development of a Low Cost High Voltage Hall Accelerator Propulsion System for NASA Science Missions , 2011 .

[14]  Eric Pencil,et al.  The NASA In-Space Propulsion Technology project's current products and future directions , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[15]  R. W. Moses,et al.  Atmospheric Entry Studies for Saturn Missions: 45 Sphere-Cone Rigid Aeroshells and Ballistic Entries , 2013 .

[16]  Eric Pencil,et al.  Propulsion Technology Development for Sample Return Missions Under NASA's ISPT Program , 2011 .

[17]  Gregory J. Whiffen,et al.  Mystic: Implementation of the Static Dynamic Optimal Control Algorithm for High-Fidelity, Low-Thrust Trajectory Design , 2006 .

[18]  Bryan Bias,et al.  Off Design Simulation Results of Several Operating Conditions of the NEXT Discharge Chamber , 2011 .

[19]  George C. Soulas,et al.  The Impact of Back-Sputtered Carbon on the Accelerator Grid Wear Rates of the NEXT and NSTAR Ion Thrusters , 2013 .

[20]  Dinesh K. Prabhu,et al.  The Impact of Flowfield-Radiation Coupling on Aeroheating for Titan Aerocapture , 2004 .

[21]  R. Spektor.  Characterization of the NASA NEXT Thruster , 2009 .

[22]  L. Glaab,et al.  Status of Sample Return Propulsion technology development under NASA's ISPT program , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[23]  Richard Mattingly,et al.  Mars Sample Return as a campaign , 2011, 2011 Aerospace Conference.

[24]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Status of NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Long-Duration Test as of 50,000 h and 900 kg Throughput , 2013 .

[25]  William M. Congdon.  Family Systems of Advanced Charring Ablators for Planetary Aerocapture and Entry Missions , 2007 .

[26]  Anita Sengupta,et al.  Systems Engineering and Technology Considerations of a Mars Ascent Vehicle , 2012 .

[27]  Ethiraj Venkatapathy,et al.  Thermal Soak Analysis of Earth Entry Vehicles , 2012 .

[28]  M. Patterson,et al.  Thrust Stand Characterization of the NASA Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) , 2011 .

[29]  A. Sengupta,et al.  Mars Ascent Vehicle system studies and baseline conceptual design , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[30]  John W. Dankanich.  Electric Propulsion for Small Body Missions , 2010 .

[31]  Matthew A. Vavrina,et al.  Implementation of a Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization Algorithm for Preliminary Design , 2006 .

[32]  Eric Pencil,et al.  Sample return propulsion technology development under NASA's ISPT project , 2011, 2011 Aerospace Conference.

[33]  Scott Miller,et al.  Performance Results for the Advanced Materials Bipropellant Rocket (AMBR) Engine , 2010 .

[34]  J. A. Samareh,et al.  An integrated tool for system analysis of sample return vehicles , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[35]  Peter Stoltz,et al.  Fully Coupled Electric Field/PIC-MCC Simulation Results of the Plasma in the Discharge Chamber of an Ion Engine , 2011 .

[36]  Jacob Williams,et al.  Theoretical Foundation of Copernicus: A Unified System for Trajectory Design and Optimization , 2010 .

[37]  Luis Pinero,et al.  NEXT Engineering Model PPU Development, Progress and Plans , 2011 .

[38]  Eric Pencil,et al.  In-Space Propulsion Technology products for NASA's future science and exploration missions , 2011, 2011 Aerospace Conference.

[39]  Michael Jonell,et al.  Particle-Based Plasma Simulation of NEXT Ion Engine , 2009 .

[40]  James Menart,et al.  Particle Based Plasma Simulations for an Ion Engine Discharge Chamber , 2007 .

[41]  A. Sengupta,et al.  Systems engineering and support systems technology considerations of a Mars Ascent Vehicle , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[42]  Deepak Bose,et al.  Probabilistic Modeling of Aerothermal and Thermal Protection Material Response Uncertainties , 2007 .

[44]  B. Sutter,et al.  Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV): Designing for high heritage and low risk , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[45]  Michael Jonell,et al.  Particle-in-Cell Model of the NEXT Ion Engine at Three Throttling Conditions , 2010 .

[47]  Greg Mungas,et al.  NOFBX™ single stage to Orbit Mars Ascent Vehicle , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.