Unraveling low abundance intimate mixtures with deep learning

The high-confidence detection and identification of very low abundance, subpixel quantities of solid materials in nonlinear/intimate mixtures are still significant challenges for hyperspectral imagery (HSI) data analysis. We compare the ability of a traditional, shallow neural network (NN), deep learning with a convolutional neural network (DL/CNN), and a support vector machine (SVM) to analyze spectral signatures of nonlinear mixtures. Traditional mainstay algorithms (e.g., spectral unmixing, the matched filter) are also applied. Using a benchtop shortwave infrared (SWIR) hyperspectral imager, we acquired several microscenes of intimate mixtures of sand and neodymium oxide (Nd2O3). A microscene is a hyperspectral image measured in a laboratory. Several hundred thousand labeled spectra are easily and rapidly generated in one HSI cube of a microscene. Individual Petri dishes of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 weight-percent (wt. %) Nd2O3 with a silicate sand comprise a suite of microscenes furnishing labeled spectra for analysis. The NN and the DL/CNN both have average validation accuracies of ≥ 98 % (for the low wt. % classes); the SVM yields similar performance. As wt. % Nd2O3 increases, accuracies decrease slightly—perhaps due to the dominance of the Nd2O3 signature in the mixtures, which causes an increasing difficulty in separation. For example, this could affect the 4 and 5 wt. % classes in which the Nd2O3 would be easily detected and identified with traditional, mainstay HSI algorithms. The fact that neural network methods can separate such low quantity classes (e.g., 0, 0.5, and 1 wt. %), though not unexpected, is encouraging and demonstrates the potential of NNs and DL/CNNs for such detailed HSI analysis.

[1]  Gail A. Carpenter,et al.  A Neural Network Method for Mixture Estimation for Vegetation Mapping , 1999 .

[2]  S. J. Sutley,et al.  Imaging spectroscopy: Earth and planetary remote sensing with the USGS Tetracorder and expert systems , 2003 .

[3]  Yahya H. Zweiri,et al.  Hybrid Spectral Unmixing: Using Artificial Neural Networks for Linear/Non-Linear Switching , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[4]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Nonlinear Unmixing of Hyperspectral Images: Models and Algorithms , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[5]  Robert S. Rand,et al.  An analysis of the nonlinear spectral mixing of didymium and soda-lime glass beads using hyperspectral imagery (HSI) microscopy , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[6]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  On the use of small training sets for neural network-based characterization of mixed pixels in remotely sensed hyperspectral images , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  David W. Allen,et al.  A microscene approach to the evaluation of hyperspectral system level performance , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[8]  Antonio Plaza,et al.  NONLINEAR NEURAL NETWORK MIXTURE MODELS FOR FRACTIONAL ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AVIRIS HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES , 2005 .

[9]  Fabio Del Frate,et al.  Pixel Unmixing in Hyperspectral Data by Means of Neural Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Raymond F. Kokaly,et al.  PRISM: Processing routines in IDL for spectroscopic measurements (installation manual and user's guide, version 1.0) , 2011 .

[11]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  A quantitative and comparative analysis of linear and nonlinear spectral mixture models using radial basis function neural networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  T. V. Ramachandra,et al.  A Neural Network Based Hybrid Mixture Model to Extract Information from Non-linear Mixed Pixels , 2012, Inf..

[13]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Hyperspectral Unmixing Using a Neural Network Autoencoder , 2018, IEEE Access.

[14]  William Basener,et al.  Microscene evaluation using the Bhattacharyya distance , 2018, Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[15]  Robert S. Rand,et al.  Modeling linear and intimate mixtures of materials in hyperspectral imagery with single-scattering albedo and kernel approaches , 2017 .