E-campaigning versus the Public Official Election Act in South Korea: Causes, consequences and implications of cyber-exile

Purpose – South Korea imposes more stringent restrictions on political speeches during elections than many other democratic countries. The purpose of this paper is to examine the long‐standing conflict between citizens and institutions in the Korean electoral environment and the effects of the internet on this conflict.Design/methodology/approach – The paper provides a case study of the 2007 presidential election in Korea. During the campaign period, two video clips (one on YouTube and the other on Daum, a major domestic web portal) emerged and implicated the then‐leading candidate in a financial scandal. The paper investigates how these video clips were shared and discussed among Korean voters, even though the country's election laws restricted the sharing of such information in cyberspace. The paper employs a combination of network analysis techniques, including hyperlink analysis, interaction network analysis, and semantic network analysis.Findings – YouTube served as a medium for Korean voters to circ...

[1]  Jody C. Baumgartner,et al.  MyFaceTube Politics , 2010 .

[2]  Graham M. Jones,et al.  Talking Text and Talking Back: "My BFF Jill" from Boob Tube to YouTube , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Miriam A. Locher,et al.  ‘So let's talk. Let's chat. Let's start a dialog’: An analysis of the conversation metaphor employed in Clinton's and Obama's YouTube campaign clips , 2008 .

[4]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Ting Wang,et al.  Co-word Analysis of Open-End Answers from Chinese Internet Users , 2009 .

[6]  D. Weinberger.  Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder , 2007 .

[7]  Paul M. Haridakis,et al.  Social Interaction and Co-Viewing With YouTube: Blending Mass Communication Reception and Social Connection , 2009 .

[8]  Elisabetta Adami.  ‘We/YouTube’: exploring sign-making in video-interaction , 2009 .

[9]  Nicholas W. Jankowski,et al.  A Hyperlink Network Analysis of Citizen Blogs in South Korean Politics , 2008 .

[10]  Scott P. Robertson,et al.  Online Video “Friends” Social Networking: Overlapping Online Public Spheres in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election , 2010 .

[11]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  It's Complicated: Facebook Users' Political Participation in the 2008 Election , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[12]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[13]  A. Chadwick.  Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance , 2009 .

[14]  Patricia G. Lange.  Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  D. Karpf.  Macaca Moments Reconsidered: Electoral Panopticon or Netroots Mobilization? , 2010 .

[16]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Analyzing online political discussions: Methodological considerations , 2008 .

[17]  C. Carpenter,et al.  The Obamachine: Technopolitics 2.0 , 2010 .

[18]  Han Woo Park,et al.  A Mixed Text Analysis of User Comments on a Portal Site : The `BBK Scandal' in the 2007 Presidential Election of South Korea , 2009 .

[19]  Yeonjin Lee.  Internet Election 2.0? Culture, Institutions, and Technology in the Korean Presidential Elections of 2002 and 2007 , 2009 .

[20]  S. Church.  YouTube Politics: YouChoose and Leadership Rhetoric During the 2008 Election , 2010 .

[21]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[22]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Developing network indicators for ideological landscapes from the political blogosphere in South Korea , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Tom Carlson,et al.  Riding the Web 2.0 Wave: Candidates on YouTube in the 2007 Finnish National Elections , 2008 .

[24]  Donna S. C. Chu.  Collective behavior in YouTube: a case study of ‘Bus Uncle’ online videos , 2009 .

[25]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Textual analysis of a political message: the inaugural addresses of two Korean presidents , 2010 .

[26]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Chapter 14 – YouTube: Contrasting Patterns of Content, Interaction, and Prominence , 2011 .

[27]  LaChrystal D. Ricke.  A New Opportunity for Democratic Engagement: The CNN-YouTube Presidential Candidate Debates , 2010 .

[28]  Han Woo Park,et al.  The Network Structure of the Korean Blogosphere , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text , 2004 .

[30]  Nico Carpentier,et al.  Participation Is Not Enough , 2009 .

[31]  Pyungho Kim,et al.  Is Korea a Strong Internet Nation? , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[32]  Han Woo Park,et al.  The Korean presidential election of 2007: 5 years on from the "Internet election" , 2008 .

[33]  P. Blitvich.  The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization , 2010 .

[34]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[35]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2008 .

[36]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  The Revolution Will be Networked , 2010 .

[37]  Joshua Green,et al.  YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture , 2009 .

[38]  Chyan Yang,et al.  Predicting the Determinants of Users' Intentions for Using YouTube to Share Video: Moderating Gender Effects , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[39]  Limor Shifman,et al.  An anatomy of a YouTube meme , 2012, New Media Soc..

[40]  Henry Jenkins.  Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide , 2006 .

[41]  Aaron Hess,et al.  Resistance Up in Smoke: Analyzing the Limitations of Deliberation on YouTube , 2009 .