On the evaluation of methods for the recovery of plant root systems from X-ray computed tomography images.

X-ray microcomputed tomography (μCT) allows nondestructive visualisation of plant root systems within their soil environment and thus offers an alternative to the commonly used destructive methodologies for the examination of plant roots and their interaction with the surrounding soil. Various methods for the recovery of root system information from X-ray computed tomography (CT) image data have been presented in the literature. Detailed, ideally quantitative, evaluation is essential, in order to determine the accuracy and limitations of the proposed methods, and to allow potential users to make informed choices among them. This, however, is a complicated task. Three-dimensional ground truth data are expensive to produce and the complexity of X-ray CT data means that manually generated ground truth may not be definitive. Similarly, artificially generated data are not entirely representative of real samples. The aims of this work are to raise awareness of the evaluation problem and to propose experimental approaches that allow the performance of root extraction methods to be assessed, ultimately improving the techniques available. To illustrate the issues, tests are conducted using both artificially generated images and real data samples.

[1]  Stefan Mairhofer,et al.  RooTrak: Automated Recovery of Three-Dimensional Plant Root Architecture in Soil from X-Ray Microcomputed Tomography Images Using Visual Tracking1[W] , 2011, Plant Physiology.

[2]  Timo Kohlberger,et al.  Evaluating Segmentation Error without Ground Truth , 2012, MICCAI.

[3]  Martin Styner,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography: Image Reconstruction from Projections , 2009, Advances in Pattern Recognition.

[5]  C. Messier,et al.  WinRHlZO™, a Root-measuring System with a Unique Overlap Correction Method , 1995 .

[6]  Robert D. Davis,et al.  SimRoot: Modelling and visualization of root systems , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[7]  J. Hopmans,et al.  Three dimensional imaging of plant roots in situ with X-ray Computed Tomography , 1997, Plant and Soil.

[8]  Mark F. Lythgoe,et al.  Is Your System Calibrated? MRI Gradient System Calibration for Pre-Clinical, High-Resolution Imaging , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Mark W. Schmidt,et al.  Modeling annotator expertise: Learning when everybody knows a bit of something , 2010, AISTATS.

[10]  K. L. Nielsen,et al.  Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerised analysis of root length and diameter , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[11]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science (2nd edition) , 2000 .

[12]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face-Recognition Algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[14]  P. Benfey,et al.  Imaging and Analysis Platform for Automatic Phenotyping and Trait Ranking of Plant Root Systems1[W][OA] , 2010, Plant Physiology.

[15]  Saoirse R Tracy,et al.  The X-factor: visualizing undisturbed root architecture in soils using X-ray computed tomography. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[16]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Image reconstruction from projections : the fundamentals of computerized tomography , 1980 .

[17]  Martha Elizabeth Shenton,et al.  On evaluating brain tissue classifiers without a ground truth , 2007, NeuroImage.

[18]  P. Toft The Radon Transform - Theory and Implementation , 1996 .

[19]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[20]  M. L. Himmelbauer,et al.  Estimating length, average diameter and surface area of roots using two different Image analyses systems , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[21]  S. Mooney,et al.  Effects of X-Ray Dose On Rhizosphere Studies Using X-Ray Computed Tomography , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  Shiv O. Prasher,et al.  Advances in the acquisition and analysis of CT scan data to isolate a crop root system from the soil medium and quantify root system complexity in 3-D space , 2006 .

[23]  Anders Kaestner,et al.  Visualizing three-dimensional root networks using computed tomography , 2006 .

[24]  Stefan Mairhofer,et al.  Recovering complete plant root system architectures from soil via X-ray μ-Computed Tomography , 2013, Plant Methods.

[25]  J. Perret,et al.  Non-destructive visualization and quantification of roots using computed tomography , 2007 .

[26]  Chris Moran,et al.  X-ray computed tomography to quantify tree rooting spatial distributions , 1999 .

[27]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.