Perception of intrusive /r/ in English by native, cross-language and cross-dialect listeners.

In sequences such as law and order, speakers of British English often insert /r/ between law and and. Acoustic analyses revealed such "intrusive" /r/ to be significantly shorter than canonical /r/. In a 2AFC experiment, native listeners heard British English sentences in which /r/ duration was manipulated across a word boundary [e.g., saw (r)ice], and orthographic and semantic factors were varied. These listeners responded categorically on the basis of acoustic evidence for /r/ alone, reporting ice after short /r/s, rice after long /r/s; orthographic and semantic factors had no effect. Dutch listeners proficient in English who heard the same materials relied less on durational cues than the native listeners, and were affected by both orthography and semantic bias. American English listeners produced intermediate responses to the same materials, being sensitive to duration (less so than native, more so than Dutch listeners), and to orthography (less so than the Dutch), but insensitive to the semantic manipulation. Listeners from language communities without common use of intrusive /r/ may thus interpret intrusive /r/ as canonical /r/, with a language difference increasing this propensity more than a dialect difference. Native listeners, however, efficiently distinguish intrusive from canonical /r/ by exploiting the relevant acoustic variation.

[1]  I. Mees,et al.  The phonetics of English and Dutch , 1996 .

[2]  A. Cutler,et al.  Processing resyllabified words in French , 2003 .

[3]  A. Cutler,et al.  Perception of suprasegmental structure in a nonnative dialect , 1999 .

[4]  Cynthia M Connine,et al.  Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Cynthia G. Clopper,et al.  Effects of dialect variation on speech intelligibility in noise , 2006 .

[6]  H. V. D. Velde Variatie en verandering in het gesproken Standaard-Nederlands (1935-1993) , 1996 .

[7]  Cynthia G. Clopper,et al.  Perceptual similarity of regional dialects of American English. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[9]  Nikolas Coupland,et al.  Dialects in Contact , 1988 .

[10]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Vowel perception: Effects of non-native language vs. non-native dialect , 2005, Speech Commun..

[12]  John C. Wells,et al.  Accents of English , 1982 .

[13]  Patricia Irwin,et al.  Bostonians /r/ Speaking: A Quantitative Look at (R) in Boston , 2007 .

[14]  Resolution of liaison for lexical access in French , 2002 .

[15]  H. Bastian Sensation and Perception.—I , 1869, Nature.

[16]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Speakers differentiate English intrusive and onset /r/, but L2 listeners do not , 2007 .

[17]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Bilinguals play by the rules : perceptual compensation for assimilation in late L 2-learners , 2006 .

[20]  V. Csépe,et al.  The role of perceptual integration in the recognition of assimilated word forms , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  P. Iverson,et al.  Vowel normalization for accent: an investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual learning for speech , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[23]  C. Best,et al.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  A. Weber,et al.  Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition , 2004 .

[25]  L Polka,et al.  Trading relations in the perception of /r/-/l/ by Japanese learners of English. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Heinz J. Giegerich,et al.  English Phonology: An Introduction , 1992 .

[27]  Ferenc Honbolygo,et al.  The Recognition of Phonologically Assimilated Words Does Not Depend on Specific Language Experience , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  J C Ingram,et al.  Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  James P. Kirby,et al.  Dialect experience in Vietnamese tone perception. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  A. Samuel,et al.  The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants , 2009 .

[32]  Paola Escudero,et al.  Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[33]  J. Flege,et al.  An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: the case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Takashi Otake,et al.  Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[35]  Stig Johansson,et al.  LINKING AND INTRUSIVE /r/ IN ENGLISH: A CASE FOR A MORE CONCRETE PHONOLOGY , 1973 .

[36]  Renée van Bezooijen,et al.  Approximant /r/ in Dutch: Routes and feelings , 2005, Speech Commun..

[37]  L Polka,et al.  Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  J L Miller,et al.  Dialect Effects in Vowel Perception: The Role of Temporal Information in French , 1997, Language and speech.

[39]  D. Scott,et al.  Segmental Phonology and the Perception of Syntactic Structure. , 1984 .

[40]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  The MBROLA project: towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[41]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[42]  A. Cruttenden Gimson's Pronunciation of English , 1994 .

[43]  Natalie Schilling-Estes,et al.  American English: Dialects and Variation , 1998 .

[44]  A. Cutler,et al.  Competition dynamics of second-language listening , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.