Hemispheric asymmetries in the transition from action preparation to execution

Abstract Flexible and adaptive behavior requires the ability to contextually stop inappropriate actions and select the right one as quickly as possible. Recently, it has been proposed that three brain regions, i.e., the inferior frontal gyrus (iFg), the anterior insula (aIns), and the anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPs), play an important role in several processing phases of perceptual decision tasks, especially in the preparation, perception and action phases, respectively. However, little is known about hemispheric differences in the activation of these three areas during the transition from perception to action. Many studies have examined how people prepare to stop upcoming responses through both proactive and reactive inhibitory control. Although inhibitory control has been associated with activity in the right prefrontal cortex (PFC), we have previously reported that, during a discriminative response task performed with the right hand, we observed: 1) a bilateral activity in the iFg during the preparation phase, and 2) a left dominant activity in the aIns and aIPs during the transition from perception to action, i.e., the so‐called stimulus‐response mapping. To clarify the hemispheric dominance of these processes, we combined the high temporal resolution of event‐related potentials (ERPs) with the high spatial resolution of event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while participants performed a discriminative response task (DRT) and a simple response task (SRT) using their non‐dominant left hand. We confirmed that proactive inhibitory control originates in the iFg: its activity started one second before the stimulus onset and was released concomitantly to the stimulus appearance. Most importantly, we confirmed the presence of a bilateral iFg activity that seems to reflect a bilateral proactive control rather than a right‐hemisphere dominance or a stronger control of the hemisphere contralateral to the responding hand. Further, we observed a stronger activation of the left aIns and a right‐lateralized activation of the aIPs reflecting left‐hemisphere dominance for stimulus‐response mapping finalized to response execution and a contralateral‐hand parietal premotor activity, respectively. HighlightsProactive inhibitory control originates in the iFg.iFg activity reflects bilateral proactive control.Left aIns activity reflects stimulus‐response mapping for response execution.Contralateral aIPs contributes to motor response planning.

[1]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[2]  Marika Berchicci,et al.  The neurophysiology of central and peripheral fatigue during sub-maximal lower limb isometric contractions , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  A. Paans,et al.  Brain Activation Related to the Representations of External Space and Body Scheme in Visuomotor Control , 2001, NeuroImage.

[4]  S. Ben Hamed,et al.  Proactive Inhibitory Control of Response as the Default State of Executive Control , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[5]  Carsten Nicolas Boehler,et al.  Pinning down response inhibition in the brain — Conjunction analyses of the Stop-signal task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  Diane Swick,et al.  Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP , 2005, NeuroImage.

[8]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Similar Cerebral Motor Plans for Real and Virtual Actions , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  Adam R Aron,et al.  Methylphenidate improves response inhibition in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[10]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Sport is not always healthy: Executive brain dysfunction in professional boxers. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[11]  A. Aron From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[12]  René J. Huster,et al.  Methods for Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: An Introductory Review , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Leung,et al.  Common and Differential Ventrolateral Prefrontal Activity during Inhibition of Hand and Eye Movements , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Gaspare Galati,et al.  Intentional signals during saccadic and reaching delays in the human posterior parietal cortex , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Why do we make mistakes? Neurocognitive processes during the preparation–perception–action cycle and error-detection , 2015, NeuroImage.

[16]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Individual differences in response speed and accuracy are associated to specific brain activities of two interacting systems , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[17]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Sabrina Pitzalis,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Brain Mapping of Motion-Onset VEPs Combined with fMRI and Retinotopic Maps , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Benefits of Physical Exercise on Basic Visuo-Motor Functions Across Age , 2014, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[21]  Philippe Boulinguez,et al.  Proactive inhibitory control of movement assessed by event-related fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  I know what I will see: action-specific motor preparation activity in a passive observation task. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[24]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Benefits of sports participation for executive function in disabled athletes. , 2010, Journal of neurotrauma.

[26]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Prefrontal hyperactivity in older people during motor planning , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady‐state visual evoked potential , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[30]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[31]  Marc Rousseaux,et al.  Divided and Focused Attention in Patients with Lesion of the Prefrontal Cortex , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  Gaspare Galati,et al.  A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system , 2008, NeuroImage.

[33]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Functional Organization of Human Intraparietal and Frontal Cortex for Attending, Looking, and Pointing , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  H Garavan,et al.  A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  B. Burle,et al.  Spatial and temporal resolutions of EEG: Is it really black and white? A scalp current density view , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[37]  Juliana Yordanova,et al.  On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3 , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[38]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  The Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus Mediates Grasp Execution, Independent of Requirement to Update: New Insights from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  R. Constable,et al.  Imaging Response Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task: Neural Correlates Independent of Signal Monitoring and Post-Response Processing , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) , 1995, NeuroImage.

[41]  H. Leung,et al.  Cortical activity during manual response inhibition guided by color and orientation cues , 2009, Brain Research.

[42]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  D. Swick,et al.  Lateralization of Response Inhibition in the Inferior Frontal Gyrus: It's Not Always Right , 2009, NeuroImage.

[45]  G. Logan,et al.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: The insula and the significance of failed inhibition , 2006, Brain Research.

[47]  Scott A Langenecker,et al.  Frontal recruitment during response inhibition in older adults replicated with fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[48]  J. Culham,et al.  The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: What have we learned from neuroimaging? , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  Sabrina Pitzalis,et al.  Parallel motion signals to the medial and lateral motion areas V6 and MT+ , 2013, NeuroImage.

[50]  M. W. Molen,et al.  A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[51]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal brain mapping during preparation, perception, and action , 2016, NeuroImage.

[52]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Brain waves from an “isolated” cortex: contribution of the anterior insula to cognitive functions , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[53]  Sabrina Pitzalis,et al.  EEG–fMRI Combination for the Study of Visual Perception and Spatial Attention , 2014 .

[54]  Katya Rubia,et al.  Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[55]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Common and unique components of inhibition and working memory: An fMRI, within-subjects investigation , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  A. Turken,et al.  Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[57]  Hein T. van Schie,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying immediate and final action goals in object use reflected by slow wave brain potentials , 2007, Brain Research.

[58]  Claudio Babiloni,et al.  Hemispherical Asymmetry in Human SMA During Voluntary Simple Unilateral Movements. An fMRI Study , 2003, Cortex.

[59]  Marika Berchicci,et al.  Benefits of Physical Exercise on the Aging Brain: The Role of the Prefrontal Cortex , 2013, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[60]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[61]  E. Drewe Go - No Go Learning After Frontal Lobe Lesions in Humans , 1975, Cortex.

[62]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[63]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Frontal Networks for Learning and Executing Arbitrary Stimulus-Response Associations , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  T. Shallice,et al.  Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[65]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  The premotor role of the prefrontal cortex in response consistency. , 2015, Neuropsychology.

[66]  M. Berchicci,et al.  Effect of target probability on pre-stimulus brain activity , 2016, Neuroscience.

[67]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  Human parietal cortex in action , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[68]  Francesco Di Russo,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(01)00134-1 , 2001 .

[69]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Beyond grasping: Representation of action in human anterior intraparietal sulcus , 2007, NeuroImage.

[70]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[71]  Kazunori Sato,et al.  The Human Prefrontal and Parietal Association Cortices Are Involved in NO-GO Performances: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[72]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal brain mapping of spatial attention effects on pattern‐reversal ERPs , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[73]  Tor D. Wager,et al.  Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[74]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[75]  A. Anastasi Individual differences. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[76]  B. Burle,et al.  Action Monitoring and Medial Frontal Cortex: Leading Role of Supplementary Motor Area , 2014, Science.

[77]  L. Deecke,et al.  High resolution spatiotemporal analysis of the contingent negative variation in simple or complex motor tasks and a non-motor task , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[78]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. , 2005, NeuroImage.

[79]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[80]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.

[81]  J. Pekar,et al.  Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[82]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[83]  Michael M. Plichta,et al.  Sequential inhibitory control processes assessed through simultaneous EEG–fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[84]  Jonathan D. Nelson,et al.  Human cortical representations for reaching: Mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery , 2007, NeuroImage.

[85]  Borís Burle,et al.  Deficit in motor cortical activity for simultaneous bimanual responses , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[86]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. , 2007, Human movement science.

[87]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Interplay Between Conceptual Expectations and Movement Predictions Underlies Action Understanding. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[88]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Alterations in Voluntary Movement Execution in Huntington's Disease Are Related to the Dominant Motor System — Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2022 .

[89]  J. Pekar,et al.  fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[90]  M. M. C. Berg-Lenssen,et al.  A spatiotemporal dipole model of the stimulus preceding negativity (spn) prior to feedback stimuli , 2005, Brain Topography.

[91]  K. Böcker,et al.  Cortical Measures of Anticipation , 2004 .

[92]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation , 2002, NeuroImage.