A Haar wavelet-based perceptual similarity index for image quality assessment

Abstract In most practical situations, the compression or transmission of images and videos creates distortions that will eventually be perceived by a human observer. Vice versa, image and video restoration techniques, such as inpainting or denoising, aim to enhance the quality of experience of human viewers. Correctly assessing the similarity between an image and an undistorted reference image as subjectively experienced by a human viewer can thus lead to significant improvements in any transmission, compression, or restoration system. This paper introduces the Haar wavelet-based perceptual similarity index (HaarPSI), a novel and computationally inexpensive similarity measure for full reference image quality assessment. The HaarPSI utilizes the coefficients obtained from a Haar wavelet decomposition to assess local similarities between two images, as well as the relative importance of image areas. The consistency of the HaarPSI with the human quality of experience was validated on four large benchmark databases containing thousands of differently distorted images. On these databases, the HaarPSI achieves higher correlations with human opinion scores than state-of-the-art full reference similarity measures like the structural similarity index (SSIM), the feature similarity index (FSIM), and the visual saliency-based index (VSI). Along with the simple computational structure and the short execution time, these experimental results suggest a high applicability of the HaarPSI in real world tasks.

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  I. Daubechies Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets II: variations on a theme , 1993 .

[3]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Hongyu Li,et al.  VSI: A Visual Saliency-Induced Index for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  TID2008 – A database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics , 2004 .

[6]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[7]  Yi Li,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  David S. Doermann,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Visual Codebooks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  TESTS FOR RANK CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS. I , 1957 .

[10]  P Kovesi,et al.  Phase congruency: A low-level image invariant , 2000, Psychological research.

[11]  Hongyu Li,et al.  SR-SIM: A fast and high performance IQA index based on spectral residual , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[12]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey , 2011, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[13]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[14]  Sebastian Bosse,et al.  Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Neural Networks , 2016 .

[15]  J. Lubin A human vision system model for objective picture quality measurements , 1997 .

[16]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Based on Gradient Similarity , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  D. Burr,et al.  Mach bands are phase dependent , 1986, Nature.

[18]  Jessika Weiss,et al.  Vision Science Photons To Phenomenology , 2016 .

[19]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Estimating Just-Noticeable Distortion for Video , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[20]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[21]  Valero Laparra,et al.  Perceptually Optimized Image Rendering , 2017, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Application of a Noise Adaptive Contrast Sensitivity Function to Image Data Compression , 1989, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[23]  I. Daubechies Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets , 1988 .

[24]  I. Daubechies,et al.  Biorthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets , 1992 .

[25]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003 .

[27]  A. Haar Zur Theorie der orthogonalen Funktionensysteme , 1910 .

[28]  Bernd Girod,et al.  What's wrong with mean-squared error? , 1993 .

[29]  Sebastian Bosse,et al.  A deep neural network for image quality assessment , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[30]  Richard Dosselmann,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of the structural similarity index , 2011, Signal Image Video Process..

[31]  Methods , metrics and procedures for statistical evaluation , qualification and comparison of objective quality prediction models , 2013 .

[32]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Image quality and entropy masking , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[33]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  Image database TID2013: Peculiarities, results and perspectives , 2015, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[34]  Peng Zhang,et al.  SOM: Semantic obviousness metric for image quality assessment , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).