Detecting Facial Retouching Using Supervised Deep Learning

Digitally altering, or retouching, face images is a common practice for images on social media, photo sharing websites, and even identification cards when the standards are not strictly enforced. This research demonstrates the effect of digital alterations on the performance of automatic face recognition, and also introduces an algorithm to classify face images as original or retouched with high accuracy. We first introduce two face image databases with unaltered and retouched images. Face recognition experiments performed on these databases show that when a retouched image is matched with its original image or an unaltered gallery image, the identification performance is considerably degraded, with a drop in matching accuracy of up to 25%. However, when images are retouched with the same style, the matching accuracy can be misleadingly high in comparison with matching original images. To detect retouching in face images, a novel supervised deep Boltzmann machine algorithm is proposed. It uses facial parts to learn discriminative features to classify face images as original or retouched. The proposed approach for classifying images as original or retouched yields an accuracy of over 87% on the data sets introduced in this paper and over 99% on three other makeup data sets used by previous researchers. This is a substantial increase in accuracy over the previous state-of-the-art algorithm, which has shown <;50% accuracy in classifying original and retouched images from the ND-IIITD retouched faces database.

[1]  Hany Farid,et al.  A perceptual metric for photo retouching , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Tejas I. Dhamecha,et al.  Recognizing Disguised Faces: Human and Machine Evaluation , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Classification using discriminative restricted Boltzmann machines , 2008, ICML '08.

[4]  Cheng-Chew Lim,et al.  An Implementation of Training Dual-nu Support Vector Machines , 2005 .

[5]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Generative versus discriminative training of RBMs for classification of fMRI images , 2008, NIPS.

[6]  Himanshu S. Bhatt,et al.  Plastic Surgery: A New Dimension to Face Recognition , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Open source biometric recognition , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[8]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[9]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Assessment of Time Dependency in Face Recognition: An Initial Study , 2003, AVBPA.

[10]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Handbook of Biometric Anti-Spoofing , 2014, Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Davide Maltoni,et al.  On the Impact of Alterations on Face Photo Recognition Accuracy , 2013, ICIAP.

[12]  Davide Maltoni,et al.  The magic passport , 2014, IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics.

[13]  Arun Ross,et al.  Can facial cosmetics affect the matching accuracy of face recognition systems? , 2012, 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[14]  Jean-Luc Dugelay,et al.  Facial makeup detection technique based on texture and shape analysis , 2015, 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG).

[15]  James F. O'Brien,et al.  Exposing Photo Manipulation from Shading and Shadows , 2014, ACM Trans. Graph..

[16]  Arun Ross,et al.  Automatic facial makeup detection with application in face recognition , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB).