A comparison of environmental, soil fertility, yield, and economical effects in six cropping systems based on an 8-year experiment in Norway

Abstract Development of environmentally and economically sound agricultural production systems is an important aim in agricultural policy and has a high priority in agricultural research worldwide. The present work uses results from the first complete crop rotation period (1990–1997) of the Apelsvoll cropping system experiment in south-eastern Norway to discuss the effect of cropping systems and their management practices on environment, soil fertility, crop yields and the farm economy, and how this knowledge may be used to develop a more sustainable agriculture. The experiment includes conventional arable (CON-A), integrated arable (INT-A), ecological arable (ECO-A), conventional forage (CON-F), integrated forage (INT-F) and ecological forage (ECO-F) cropping systems which were established on model farms of 0.2 ha. On the basis of nutrient runoff, soil erosion and pesticide contamination, the following ranking from the most to the least favourable was made for environmental effects: INT-F>ECO-F>ECO-A>INT-A>CON-F>CON-A. Environmental effects such as N and P runoff losses were very much linked to the proportion of ley in the system. Thus, major improvements to reduce the effects of agriculture on nutrient runoff, cannot be achieved without changing the cropping systems in the direction of more mixed farming with reduced cropping intensity. The nutrient balance calculations showed that there were considerable deficits in the ecological systems, a fact which must be taken into consideration in the development of sustainable ecological cropping systems. The yield reduction experienced with integrated and ecological cropping, relative to conventional cropping, was smaller for forage crops and potatoes than for cereals. This suggests that it is easier to maintain the yield level by reduced cropping intensity in mixed farming systems with livestock than in arable farming systems without livestock. Because of the premium prices and government subsidies to ecological farming, the economic results were equally good in the ecological systems as in the conventional ones. Economically, integrated farming was less favourable than the other systems. It is concluded that, overall, integrated and ecological forage systems results in the least environmental harm, and based upon the present government subsidies, the forage systems also seem the most profitable, along with the ecological arable system.

[1]  T. Knight,et al.  Long-term effects of conventional and no-tillage on selected soil properties and crop yields in Canterbury, New Zealand , 1993 .

[2]  G. W. Heath.  THE INFLUENCE OF LEY MANAGEMENT ON EARTHWORM POPULATIONS , 1962 .

[3]  P. Vereijken,et al.  A methodic way to more sustainable farming systems , 1992 .

[4]  J. Olesen,et al.  Nutrient balances and yields during conversion to organic farming in two crop rotation systems. , 1999 .

[5]  A. Løes,et al.  Changes in the nutrient content of agricultural soil on conversion to organic farming in relation to farm‐level nutrient balances and soil contents of clay and organic matter , 1997 .

[6]  A. Korsaeth,et al.  Nitrogen mass balances in conventional, integrated and ecological cropping systems and the relationship between balance calculations and nitrogen runoff in an 8-year field experiment in Norway , 2000 .

[7]  J. Uusi-Kämppä,et al.  Leaching of Phosphorus, Calcium, Magnesium and Potassium in Barley, Grass and Fallow Lysimeters , 1996 .

[8]  V.W.L. Jordan,et al.  Research into and development of integrated farming systems for less-intensive arable crop production: experimental progress (1989-1994) and commercial implementation , 1997 .

[9]  R. Eltun,et al.  The Apelsvoll cropping system experiment VII. Runoff losses of soil particles, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium and sulphur , 1996 .

[10]  G. Sparling,et al.  Soil microbial biomass, activity and nutrient cycling as indicators of soil health , 1997 .

[11]  R. Eltun.  Comparisons of Nitrogen Leaching in Ecological and Conventional Cropping Systems , 1995 .

[12]  J. Olesen,et al.  Designing and testing crop rotations for organic farming. Proceedings from an international workshop , 1999 .

[13]  H. Insam,et al.  Microbial communities : functional versus structural approaches , 1997 .

[14]  T. A. Breland,et al.  Soil microbial biomass and mineralization of carbon and nitrogen in ecological, integrated and conventional forage and arable cropping systems , 1999, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[15]  R. Eltun,et al.  The Apelsvoll cropping system experiment II. Soil characteristics , 1994 .

[16]  C. Pankhurst,et al.  Biological Indicators of Soil Health , 1997 .

[17]  J. Doran,et al.  Defining and assessing soil health and sustainable productivity. , 1997 .

[18]  S. Traina,et al.  Organic and Conventional Management Effects on Biologically Active Soil Organic Matter Pools , 1994 .

[19]  B. Christensen.  The Askov Long-Term Experiments on Animal Manure and Mineral Fertilizers , 1996 .

[20]  S. L. Oberle,et al.  A CASE FOR AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH , 1991 .

[21]  W. Lockeretz.  Multidisciplinary Research and Sustainable Agriculture , 1991 .

[22]  R. Eltun,et al.  Long‐term developments in the carabid and staphylinid (Col., CArabidae and Staphylinidae) fauna during conversion from conventional to bilogivcal farming , 2000 .

[23]  Daniel B. Taylor,et al.  Whole farm systems research: An integrated crop and livestock systems comparison study , 1994 .

[24]  Molly D. Anderson.  Reasons for New Interest in On-Farm Research , 1992 .