Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to compare a low-dose abdominal CT protocol, delivering a dose of radiation close to the dose delivered by abdominal radiography, with standard-dose unenhanced CT in patients with suspected renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred twenty-five patients (87 men, 38 women; mean age, 45 years) who were admitted with suspected renal colic underwent both abdominal low-dose CT (30 mAs) and standard-dose CT (180 mAs). Low-dose CT and standard-dose CT were independently reviewed, in a delayed fashion, by two radiologists for the characterization of renal and ureteral calculi (location, size) and for indirect signs of renal colic (renal enlargement, pyeloureteral dilatation, periureteral or renal stranding). Results reported for low-dose CT, with regard to the patients' body mass indexes (BMIs), were compared with those obtained with standard-dose CT (reference standard). The presence of non-urinary tract-related disorders was also assessed. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. RESULTS In patients with a BMI < 30, low-dose CT achieved 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the detection of indirect signs of renal colic and a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 97% for detecting ureteral calculi. In patients with a BMI < 30, low-dose CT was 86% sensitive for detecting ureteral calculi < 3 mm and 100% sensitive for detecting calculi > 3 mm. Low-dose CT was 100% sensitive and specific for depicting non-urinary tract-related disorders (n = 6). CONCLUSION Low-dose CT achieves sensitivities and specificities close to those of standard-dose CT in assessing the diagnosis of renal colic, depicting ureteral calculi > 3 mm in patients with a BMI < 30, and correctly identifying alternative diagnoses.

[1]  F. Stacul,et al.  Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic , 2001, European Radiology.

[2]  N. Takahashi,et al.  Unenhanced helical CT of ureterolithiasis: value of the tissue rim sign. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  J. Platt,et al.  Assessment of the clinical utility of the rim and comet-tail signs in differentiating ureteral stones from phleboliths. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  S. Reddy.  State of the art trends in imaging renal of colic , 2008, Emergency Radiology.

[5]  Bong Soo Kim,et al.  Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[6]  Eric P Tamm,et al.  Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. , 2003, Radiology.

[7]  F. Wawroschek,et al.  Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[8]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  B. Siewert,et al.  Missed lesions at abdominal oncologic CT: lessons learned from quality assurance. , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  R C Smith,et al.  The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[11]  G. Stevenson,et al.  Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. , 2000, Radiology.

[12]  G. Israel,et al.  Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality? , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  G. Bongartz,et al.  Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  F. G. Sommer,et al.  Can low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT be used for routine evaluation of suspected renal colic? , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  M. Patlas,et al.  Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Does Ultra-Low-Dose CT With a Radiation Dose Equivalent to That of KUB Suffice to Detect Renal and Ureteral Calculi? , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  John D Denstedt,et al.  Imaging in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of stone patients. , 2009, Advances in chronic kidney disease.

[18]  Sharyn I. Katz,et al.  Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Benjamin M Yeh,et al.  Physiology of renal medullary tip hyperattenuation at unenhanced CT: urinary specific gravity and the NaCl concentration gradient. , 2008, Radiology.

[20]  Donald P Frush,et al.  CT with a computer-simulated dose reduction technique for detection of pediatric nephroureterolithiasis: comparison of standard and reduced radiation doses. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  R. Nelson,et al.  Decreasing the radiation dose for renal stone CT: a feasibility study of single- and multidetector CT. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  D. DeLong,et al.  Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison. , 2000, Radiology.

[23]  M. Pearle,et al.  Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[24]  D. DeLong,et al.  Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques. , 2003, Radiology.

[25]  M. Macari,et al.  Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen , 2008, European Radiology.

[26]  J. Garrow,et al.  Quetelet's index (W/H2) as a measure of fatness. , 1985, International journal of obesity.

[27]  R. Smith,et al.  Relationship between duration of pain and secondary signs of obstruction of the urinary tract on unenhanced helical CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  M. Reiser,et al.  Dual Energy CT Characterization of Urinary Calculi: Initial In Vitro and Clinical Experience , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[29]  T. Meagher,et al.  Low dose computed tomography in suspected acute renal colic. , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[30]  M. Kalra,et al.  CT of the urinary tract: turning attention to radiation dose. , 2008, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[31]  T. Gasser,et al.  [Diagnosis and therapy of acute ureteral colic]. , 2008, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[32]  C. Iselin,et al.  Abdominal plain film in patients admitted with clinical suspicion of renal colic: should it be replaced by low-dose computed tomography? , 2006, Urology.

[33]  G. Preminger,et al.  Unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[34]  C. Kane,et al.  Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide for patient education. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[35]  R. Dixon,et al.  Radiology of urolithiasis: implications of radiation exposure and new imaging modalities. , 2009, Advances in chronic kidney disease.

[36]  K E Applegate,et al.  Impact in the emergency department of unenhanced CT on diagnostic confidence and therapeutic efficacy in patients with suspected renal colic: a prospective survey. 2000 ARRS President's Award. American Roentgen Ray Society. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  Robert C. Smith,et al.  Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  D. Katz,et al.  Unenhanced Helical CT Using Increased Pitch for Suspected Renal Colic: An Effective Technique for Radiation Dose Reduction? , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[39]  J. Teichman.  Acute Renal Colic from Ureteral Calculus , 2004 .

[40]  M. Kalra,et al.  Acute abdominal pain: value of non-contrast enhanced ultra-low-dose multi-detector row CT as a substitute for abdominal radiographs , 2008, Emergency Radiology.

[41]  M. Monga,et al.  Imaging modalities for urolithiasis: impact on management , 2008, Current opinion in urology.

[42]  F. Verdun,et al.  Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis , 2009, European Radiology.

[43]  W. Huda,et al.  Effective dose equivalents, HE, in diagnostic radiology. , 1990, Medical physics.

[44]  Lisa M Ho,et al.  Conventional and reduced radiation dose of 16-MDCT for detection of nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[45]  N. Al-Nakshabandi.  The soft-tissue rim sign. , 2003, Radiology.

[46]  B. Finlayson,et al.  The frequency of urolithiasis in hospital discharge diagnoses in the United States. , 1978, Investigative urology.

[47]  W D Foley,et al.  Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[48]  J. Watanabe,et al.  Clinical characteristics of ureteral calculi detected by nonenhanced computerized tomography after unclear results of plain radiography and ultrasonography. , 2003, The Journal of urology.