The Effect of Cell Phone Bans on Driver Behavior , Accidents , and Casualties

In response to concerns that distracted driving due to cell phone use has become a threat to roadway safety, many states have passed cell phone bans that prohibit drivers from texting and talking on handheld cell phones. This paper empirically examines the impact of these bans on driver cell phone usage, traffic accidents, and casualties. To distinguish the effect of the bans from confounding factors, I use a difference-in-differences approach that exploits the within-state variation in the adoption of cell phone bans. Results indicate that prohibiting drivers from texting and talking on handheld cell phones reduces drivers’ handheld device manipulation and cell phone use by 60 and 40 percent, respectively. This effect is largely driven by adult drivers and drivers with passengers. However, cell phone bans do not appear to have any meaningful impact on accidents and casualties. Several robustness and falsification exercises, including permutation tests using placebo ban estimates, are used to test the validity of both the estimates and their statistical significance. _________________ † Cheng Cheng: Texas A&M University, Department of Economics, 3050 Allen Building, 4228 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843 (Email: ccheng@econ.tamu.edu). I thank Mark Hoekstra, Christopher Carpenter, Scott Adams, Daniel Hamermesh, Jonathan Meer and Jeremy West for helpful comments and suggestions. I also thank Timothy Pickrell of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for providing raw data of the National Occupant Protection Use Survey.

[1]  J. Angrist,et al.  Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics , 1998 .

[2]  Neil K Chaudhary,et al.  High visibility enforcement demonstration programs in Connecticut and New York reduce hand-held phone use. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  S. Peltzman The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation , 1975, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Alexander C. Wagenaar,et al.  State laws restricting driver use of mobile communications devices distracted-driving provisions, 1992-2010. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  Nathan Nunn,et al.  The Potato's Contribution to Population and Urbanization: Evidence from an Historical Experiment , 2009, The quarterly journal of economics.

[6]  Lee Rainie,et al.  Adults and Cell Phone Distractions , 2010 .

[7]  Neil K Chaudhary,et al.  District of Columbia. , 1896, The Journal of comparative medicine and veterinary archives.

[8]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Longer-Term Effects of Washington, DC, Law on Drivers' Hand-Held Cell Phone Use , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[9]  Saurabh Bhargava,et al.  Driving under the (Cellular) Influence , 2013 .

[10]  Christopher R. Taber,et al.  Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  Raj Chetty,et al.  Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence , 2009 .

[12]  Nicholas Burger,et al.  Did California’s hand-held cell phone ban reduce accidents? , 2014 .

[13]  Christopher S. Carpenter,et al.  Current Draft : March 2010 Intended and Unintended Consequences of Youth Bicycle Helmet Laws , 2010 .

[14]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .