Coercion and Contract at the Margins: Deportable Labor and the Laws of Employment Termination Under US Capitalism (1942–2015)

In 1917, Congress created the status of temporary labor migrant. A new kind of restricted worker born from nineteenth-century free labor politics, employer and citizen worker demands under modern liberal capitalism, and state labor market regulation, temporary migrants have always had an employer-dependent legal status and been subject to deportation. Yet, since 1942, changing rights and legal processes have governed migrant employment termination across sectors. By drawing on employment cases from archival and unpublished files made available to me under FOIA, and court decisions, I compare the impact of laws of employment termination on deportable laborers beginning in 1942, when government agencies planned migration, and under privatized migration after 1964. From agriculture and war to today's service and knowledge economies, I demonstrate how employment rights have always shaped deportable workers' legal status. Yet, I also show how today's rights and legal processes, in contrast to the past, hardly mitigate employer control over migrants under contemporary capitalism.

[1]  D. Gifford.  1950 , 2018, The Selected Letters of John Berryman.

[2]  David Cook-Martín.  Contesting Immigration Policy in Court: Legal Activism and Its Radiating Effects in the United States and France, by Leila Kawar , 2016 .

[3]  L. Kawar.  Contesting Immigration Policy in Court: Legal Activism and its Radiating Effects in the United States and France , 2016 .

[4]  S. Lakhani,et al.  Incomplete Inclusion: Legal Violence and Immigrants in Liminal Legal Statuses , 2015 .

[5]  G. Clark,et al.  “Humbug” or “Human Good?”: E.P. Thompson, the Rule of Law and Coercive Labor Relations Under Neoliberal American Capitalism , 2015 .

[6]  Rudi Batzell.  Free Labour, Capitalism and the Anti-Slavery Origins of Chinese Exclusion in California in the 1870s , 2014 .

[7]  S. Lakhani.  Producing Immigrant Victims’ “Right” to Legal Status and the Management of Legal Uncertainty , 2013, Law & Social Inquiry.

[8]  Adam Hanieh.  Capitalism and Class in the Gulf Arab States , 2011 .

[9]  D. Tompkins.  State Power , 2011, The Classical Review.

[10]  B. Anderson.  Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers , 2010 .

[11]  R. Raghunath.  A Promise the Nation Cannot Keep: What Prevents the Application of the Thirteenth Amendment in Prison? , 2009 .

[12]  G. Menz.  The political economy of managed migration , 2009 .

[13]  T. Stovall.  :The Boundaries of the Republic: Migrant Rights and the Limits of Universalism in France, 1918–1940 , 2008 .

[14]  Hülya Yilmaz.  The Guest Worker Question in Postwar Germany , 2008 .

[15]  R. Bird,et al.  The Structure of American Legal Institutions and the Diffusion of Wrongful‐Discharge Laws, 1978–1999 , 2008 .

[16]  Richard E. Moberly.  Unfulfilled Expectations: An Empirical Analysis of Why Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers Rarely Win , 2007 .

[17]  S. Estreicher,et al.  Employment Law Stories , 2007 .

[18]  M. Lewis.  The Boundaries of the Republic: Migrant Rights and the Limits of Universalism in France, 1918-1940 , 2007 .

[19]  Daniel Kanstroom.  Deportation Nation: Outsiders in American History , 2007 .

[20]  Juliet P. Stumpf.  The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power , 2006 .

[21]  Michael Vorenberg.  Final Freedom: The Civil War, the Abolition of Slavery, and the Thirteenth Amendment , 2001 .

[22]  M. Holley.  Disadvantaged By Design: How the Law Inhibits Agricultural Guest Workers from Enforcing Their Rights , 2001 .

[23]  C. Collomp.  Immigrants, Labor Markets, and the State, a Comparative Approach: France and the United States, 1880-1930. , 1999 .

[24]  D. Nelson.  Labor market politics and the great war: The department of labor, the states, and the first U.S. employment service, 1907–1933 , 1999 .

[25]  R. Steinfeld.  Changing Legal Conceptions of Free Labor , 1999 .

[26]  C W Maklan,et al.  Department of Veterans Affairs. , 1998, Medical care.

[27]  D. Northrup.  Indentured Labor in the Age of Imperialism, 1834-1922 , 1995 .

[28]  B. Palmer.  Citizen Worker: The Experience of Workers in the United States with Democracy and the Free Market during the Nineteenth Century. , 1995 .

[29]  A. Amin.  Post Fordism: A Reader , 1996 .

[30]  K. Calavita,et al.  Inside the state : the bracero program, immigration, and the I.N.S. , 1993 .

[31]  R. Steinfeld.  The Invention of Free Labor: The Employment Relation in English and American Law and Culture, 1350-1870 , 1991, Law and History Review.

[32]  B. Laurie.  The Invention of Free Labor: The Employment Relation in English and American Law and Culture, 1350–1870. By Robert J. Steinfeld. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991. viii + 277 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-8078-1988-3.) , 1992 .

[33]  R. Hollander.  Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement , 1992 .

[34]  A. Stanley.  Beggars Can't Be Choosers: Compulsion and Contract in Postbellum America , 1992 .

[35]  Karen Orren,et al.  Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States , 1991 .

[36]  C. Rosenstein,et al.  U.S. immigration law and the control of labor, 1820-1924 , 1986 .

[37]  J. M. Briggs.  Non-immigrant Labor Policy in the United States , 1983 .

[38]  J. Feinman.  The Development of the Employment at Will Rule , 1976 .

[39]  Otey M. Scruggs.  Evolution of the Mexican Farm Labor Agreement of 1942. , 1960 .

[40]  Phillips Bradley,et al.  Law in Books and Law in Action , 1934 .