Where did Kutsuplus drive us? Ex post evaluation of on-demand micro-transit pilot in the Helsinki capital region

Abstract As technical limitations are not anymore the main obstacle for successful urban micro-transit operation, further development has to focus on evaluating a range of potential challenges, providing lessons for policy and service development, including organisation of piloting activities. Contrastingly, few studies had employed detailed empirical data with trip and user properties to evaluate flexible micro-transit services in urban environments. This research focuses on evaluating the Kutsuplus, Helsinki Metropolitan Region (HMR) on-demand micro-transit pilot. Previous research on Kutsuplus has focused on evaluating financing and pricing policy, and users' and non-users' perceptions about the implemented service. This research develops a multidimensional evaluation framework, focused on the analysis of completed user journeys, accounting for Kutsuplus operating area, timing, and pricing scheme. Thus, this framework uses 82,290 completed Kutsuplus journeys, combined with routing, HMR travel demand data and pricing modelling. Results indicate that demand for Kutsuplus has been increasing over time, with low average vehicle occupancy, and low wait time after journey offer acceptance. Hourly demand pattern for Kutsuplus had a similar shape to the demand patter for fixed public transport, with small differences in peak time start and duration. Spatial demand had more orbital than radial direction, more versatile directional demand, focus on the western side of service area, and business-related locations in general. Most of the users were age 30 to 65, with younger or older users having also distinct trip characteristics. Kutsuplus was on par with private car for shorter journeys, but could also lead to undesired replacement of walking and cycling trips. Kutsuplus pricing was between public transport and UberPOP. With these and other results, the multidimensional evaluation framework provides a range of implications for user-centric service design, underpinned with an understanding of interdependencies between operating scheme, service pricing, and service level provided by other transport modes. Finally, we provide recommendations for further analysis of micro-transit journey data, raising implications for data collection practices in the future micro-transit pilots, and for further directions in developing our understanding of emerging mobility-on-demand services.

[1]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Performance assessment of fixed and flexible public transport in a multi agent simulation framework , 2017 .

[2]  M. Quddus,et al.  A survey of Demand Responsive Transport in Great Britain , 2012 .

[3]  Nagendra R. Velaga,et al.  The Potential Role of Flexible Transport Services in Enhancing Rural Public Transport Provision , 2012 .

[4]  John D. Nelson,et al.  User perspectives on emerging mobility services: Ex post analysis of Kutsuplus pilot , 2018, Research in Transportation Business & Management.

[5]  Milos N. Mladenovic,et al.  Policy lessons from the flexible transport service pilot Kutsuplus in the Helsinki Capital Region , 2017, Transport Policy.

[6]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling , 2018, Transport Reviews.

[7]  Joseph P. Schwieterman,et al.  Uber Economics: Evaluating the Monetary and Travel Time Trade-Offs of Transportation Network Companies and Transit Service in Chicago, Illinois , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[8]  Montasir M Abbas,et al.  Decision Support System for Planning Traffic Operations Assets , 2017 .

[9]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  A stochastic model for a vehicle in a dial-a-ride system , 2010, Oper. Res. Lett..

[10]  Z. Fang,et al.  Understanding the Dynamics of the Pick-Up and Drop-Off Locations of Taxicabs in the Context of a Subsidy War among E-Hailing Apps , 2018 .

[11]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[12]  Jani-Pekka Jokinen,et al.  Economic Perspectives on Automated Demand Responsive Transportation and Shared Taxi Services - Analytical models and simulations for policy analysis , 2016 .

[13]  J. Nelson,et al.  DEMAND RESPONSIVE TRANSPORT: TOWARDS THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW MARKET SEGMENT , 2004 .

[14]  Xiaowei Chen,et al.  Exploring impacts of on-demand ridesplitting on mobility via real-world ridesourcing data and questionnaires , 2018, Transportation.

[15]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Ridesharing and the Use of Public Transportation , 2018, International Conference on Interaction Sciences.

[16]  Milos N. Mladenovic,et al.  Understanding the complexity of mobility as a service , 2018, Research in Transportation Business & Management.

[17]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Simulating ad-hoc demand-responsive transportation: a comparison of three approaches , 2017 .

[18]  Timothy Reardon,et al.  Substitution of Ride-Hailing Services for More Sustainable Travel Options in the Greater Boston Region , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[19]  Alejandro Henao,et al.  The impact of ride-hailing on vehicle miles traveled , 2018, Transportation.

[20]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  User Needs for Urban Car Travel , 2012 .

[21]  Lauri Häme,et al.  Demand-Responsive Transport: Models and Algorithms , 2013 .

[22]  John D. Nelson,et al.  A case study of flexible solutions to transport demand in a deregulated environment , 2007 .

[23]  Tamer Çetin,et al.  Regulation of taxis and the rise of ridesharing , 2017, Transport Policy.

[24]  John D. Nelson,et al.  Shaping the New Future of Paratransit: An Agenda for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[25]  Zeina Wafa,et al.  Assessing the Impact of App-Based Ride Share Systems in an Urban Context: Findings from Austin , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[26]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  A collection of public transport network data sets for 25 cities , 2018, Scientific Data.

[27]  Brendan Finn Towards large-scale flexible transport services: A practical perspective from the domain of paratransit , 2012 .

[28]  Peter Pelzer Usefulness of planning support systems: A conceptual framework and an empirical illustration , 2017 .

[29]  E. Deakin,et al.  Markets for Dynamic Ridesharing? , 2010 .

[30]  Ziyuan Pu,et al.  Characterization of ridesplitting based on observed data: A case study of Chengdu, China , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[31]  Achille Fonzone,et al.  Operational and policy implications of ridesourcing services: A case of Uber in London, UK , 2019 .

[32]  John D. Nelson,et al.  Key lessons learned from recent experience with Flexible Transport Services , 2007 .

[33]  D. Stead,et al.  The Case of Mobility as a Service: A Critical Reflection on Challenges for Urban Transport and Mobility Governance , 2018 .

[34]  J. Mageean,et al.  The evaluation of demand responsive transport services in Europe , 2003 .

[35]  John D. Nelson,et al.  Community transport meets mobility as a service: On the road to a new a flexible future , 2018, Research in Transportation Economics.

[36]  G Ambrosino,et al.  Enabling intermodal urban transport through complementary services : from Flexible Mobility Services to the Shared Use Mobility Agency: Workshop 4. Developing inter-modal transport systems , 2016 .

[37]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  Non-myopic vehicle and route selection in dynamic DARP with travel time and workload objectives , 2012, Comput. Oper. Res..

[38]  Steven Farber,et al.  The Who, Why, and When of Uber and other Ride-hailing Trips: An Examination of a Large Sample Household Travel Survey , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[39]  Fernando Ordóñez,et al.  Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions , 2013 .

[40]  Alejandro Henao,et al.  The impact of ride hailing on parking (and vice versa) , 2019, Journal of Transport and Land Use.

[41]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Will car users change their mobility patterns with Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and microtransit? – A latent class cluster analysis , 2018 .

[42]  Tom Cohen,et al.  Being ready for the next Uber: can local government reinvent itself? , 2018, European Transport Research Review.

[43]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Travel times and transfers in public transport: Comprehensive accessibility analysis based on Pareto-optimal journeys , 2018, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[44]  K. Martens,et al.  Emerging Urban Mobility Technologies through the Lens of Everyday Urban Aesthetics , 2019, Essays in Philosophy.

[45]  D. Sui,et al.  Ridesourcing, the sharing economy, and the future of cities , 2018, Cities.

[46]  Nelson Chan,et al.  Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Facilitate the First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections , 2016 .

[47]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Assessment of large-scale transitions in public transport networks using open timetable data: case of Helsinki metro extension , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[48]  J. Nelson,et al.  Recent developments in Flexible Transport Services , 2010 .

[49]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[50]  Xiaoyue Cathy Liu,et al.  Agent-based approach to analyzing the effects of dynamic ridesharing in a multimodal network , 2019, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[51]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  Exploring the spatial variation of ridesourcing demand and its relationship to built environment and socioeconomic factors with the geographically weighted Poisson regression , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[52]  F. Alemi,et al.  Transport Policy in the Era of Ridehailing and Other Disruptive Transportation Technologies , 2018 .

[53]  M. L. Puche,et al.  Regulation of TNCs in Latin America: The Case of Uber Regulation in Mexico City and Bogota , 2018, The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems.

[54]  Oded Cats,et al.  The Potential of Demand-Responsive Transport as a Complement to Public Transport: An Assessment Framework and an Empirical Evaluation , 2018 .

[55]  John D. Nelson,et al.  Barriers to implementing flexible transport services: An international comparison of the experiences in Australia, Europe and USA , 2012 .

[56]  Alejandro Henao,et al.  Travel and energy implications of ridesourcing service in Austin, Texas , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[57]  H. Meurs,et al.  The Governance of Demand-Responsive Transit Systems—A Multi-level Perspective , 2018, The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems.

[58]  John D. Nelson,et al.  An evaluation of the user characteristics of an open access DRT service , 2012 .

[59]  Dominic Stead,et al.  Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance , 2020, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[60]  Li Li,et al.  An empirical study on travel patterns of internet based ride-sharing , 2018 .

[61]  Marcus P. Enoch,et al.  Identifying potential market niches for Demand Responsive Transport , 2012 .

[62]  Sven Agardh,et al.  Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Mixtures using Cycling Pore Pressure Conditioning , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[63]  Luis Ferreira,et al.  Evaluating Flexible Transport Solutions , 2007 .

[64]  R. Cervero,et al.  Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco , 2016 .

[65]  M. Mladenović How Should We Drive Self-driving Vehicles? Anticipation and Collective Imagination in Planning Mobility Futures , 2018, The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems.

[66]  Marcus P. Enoch,et al.  Investigating the contribution of Demand Responsive Transport to a sustainable local public transport system , 2014 .

[67]  J. Nelson,et al.  Flexible Transport Services: A New Market Opportunity for Public Transport , 2009 .