A spatial model of the evolution of quorum sensing regulating bacteriocin production

Like any form of cooperative behavior, quorum sensing (QS) in bacteria is potentially vulnerable to cheating, the occurrence of individuals that contribute less but still profit from the benefits provided by others. In this paper, we explore the evolutionary stability of QS as a regulatory mechanism of antibiotics production in a spatially structured population, using cellular automaton (CA) modeling. QSg is supposed to regulate the excretion of a bacteriocin (anticompetitor toxin) in a population of bacteria polymorphic for the ability to produce and to be immune to the bacteriocin. Both the social interactions resulting from QS and the competitive interactions resulting from the bacteriocin excretion are supposed to be only effective at the local scale, that is, restricted to the immediately neighboring cells. This implies a rather diffuse kind of group selection. The CA model is contrasted to a model assuming no spatial structure but with otherwise identical assumptions. Our analysis predicts that QS as a regulatory mechanism of bacteriocin excretion is evolutionarily unstable when the competitive interactions between bacteriocin-producing, resistant, and sensitive strains only involve closely related strains which can share the signaling and responding genes involved in QS. However, when the competition is between unrelated strains and the QS alleles can only be carried by the bacteriocin-producing strains, stable QS may evolve provided its costs are small and the critical quorum threshold is neither too low nor too high. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

[1]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Cooperation in the dark: signalling and collective action in quorum-sensing bacteria , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  B. Crespi The evolution of social behavior in microorganisms. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  M. Travisano,et al.  Strategies of microbial cheater control. , 2004, Trends in microbiology.

[4]  R. Redfield Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? , 2002, Trends in microbiology.

[5]  J. R. van der Ploeg Regulation of Bacteriocin Production in Streptococcus mutans by the Quorum-Sensing System Required for Development of Genetic Competence , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  G. J. Velicer Social strife in the microbial world. , 2003, Trends in microbiology.

[7]  J. Brookfield QUORUM SENSING AND GROUP SELECTION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  M. Gilmore,et al.  Two-component regulator of Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin responds to quorum-sensing autoinduction , 2002, Nature.

[9]  D. Wood,et al.  Phenazine antibiotic biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aureofaciens 30-84 is regulated by PhzR in response to cell density , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  K. G. Hardy Plasmids : a practical approach , 1987 .

[11]  T. Czárán,et al.  Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Oscar P. Kuipers,et al.  Quorum sensing-controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria , 1998 .

[13]  B. Oudega,et al.  Methods for studying colicins and their plasmids , 1987 .

[14]  B. Iglewski,et al.  Bacterial Quorum Sensing in Pathogenic Relationships , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[15]  E. Szathmáry,et al.  Group selection of early replicators and the origin of life. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing in bacteria. , 2001, Annual review of microbiology.