Emergy Evaluation of the Natural Value of Water Resources in Chinese Rivers

Emergy theory and method were used to evaluate the economy of China and the contributions of water resources in Chinese rivers to the real wealth of the Chinese economy. The water cycle and energy conversion were reviewed, and an emergy method for evaluating the natural value of water resources in a river watershed was developed. The indices for China calculated from the emergy evaluation were close to those of developing countries. Despite a small surplus in its balance of payments, China had a net emergy loss from its trade in 2002. The efficiency of Chinese natural resource use was still not high and did not match its economic growth rate. Furthermore, the Chinese economy placed a stress on its ecological environment and natural resources. Several indices of Chinese rivers from the emergy evaluation were close to those of average global river water. The main average indices of Chinese rivers were transformity (4.17 × 104 sej/J), emergy per volume (2.05 × 1011 sej/m3), and emdollar per volume (0.06 $/m3). The total value of all the rivers’ water made up 13.0% of the GDP of China in 2002, and that of water consumption accounted for 2.1%. The value of the water resources in the Haihe-luanhe River (11.39 × 104 sej/J) was the highest, followed by the Yellow River (10.27 × 104 sej/J), while the rivers in Southwest China had the lowest values (2.92 × 104 sej/J).

[1]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[2]  F. Molle Water pricing in Thailand: Theory and practice , 2001 .

[3]  S. Park,et al.  Emergy evaluation perspectives of a multipurpose dam proposal in Korea. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  P. Nilsson Environmental Accounting—EMERGY and Environmental Decision Making , 1997 .

[5]  Tim R. McClanahan,et al.  EMergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals , 1996 .

[6]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Evaluation of the Biosphere and Natural Capital , 1999 .

[7]  A. Buenfil,et al.  EMERGY EVALUATION OF WATER , 2001 .

[8]  Murray Patterson,et al.  Ecological production based pricing of biosphere processes , 2002 .

[9]  David N. Barton,et al.  The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica , 2002 .

[10]  Gregory M. Perry,et al.  Estimating Irrigation Water Value Using Hedonic Price Analysis: A Case Study in Malheur County, Oregon , 1999 .

[11]  M. Abu-Zeid,et al.  Water and sustainable development: the vision for world water, life and the environment 1 1 This pap , 1998 .

[12]  Ross L Chapman,et al.  Choice modelling: assessing the environmental values of water supply options , 1999 .

[13]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[14]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Calculation methods to assess the value of upstream water flows and storage as a function of downstream benefits , 2002 .

[15]  中華人民共和国国家統計局 China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[16]  Wu XiaLin Tongfeng Jiang Wenlai THE RESEARCH OF VALUE-MODEL ASSESSMENT ABOUT THE VALUE OF WATER RESOURCE , 1998 .