Competitive dynamics in two species of marine phytoplankton under non-equilibrium conditions

Although mathematical models suggest that competition between primary producers in response to dynamical changes in the availability of a limiting nutrient is non-linear, experimental data supporting this basic hypothesis are sparse. Using continuous culture systems with nitrate as a single limiting nutrient, we present results of competition experiments between 2 species of marine phytoplankton, a diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana and a coccolithophore Coccolithus braarudii. These 2 organisms of similar size represent biogeochemically and ecologically distinct functional groups. Consistent with classical resource competition theory, under steady-state nitrate limitation (i.e. continuous flow chemostats), the diatom was outcompeted by the coccolithophore. However, when pulses of nitrate were provided to the chemostats (i.e. non-equilibrium, dynamical conditions) the diatom outcompeted the coccolithophore. The rate of exclusion was a linear function of the fre- quency of nitrate pulses. These results experimentally demonstrate that dynamical nutrient supply allows co-existence of 2 primary producers competing for a single limiting nutrient and may help us to understand phytoplankton succession in the ocean.

[1]  Tyler Volk,et al.  Ocean Carbon Pumps: Analysis of Relative Strengths and Efficiencies in Ocean‐Driven Atmospheric CO2 Changes , 2013 .

[2]  T. Smayda.  Primary Production and the Global Epidemic of Phytoplankton Blooms in the Sea: A Linkage? , 2013 .

[3]  S. De Monte,et al.  Fluid dynamical niches of phytoplankton types , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Amit Tandon,et al.  Rapid changes in mixed layer stratification driven by submesoscale instabilities and winds , 2010 .

[5]  Paul G. Falkowski,et al.  The role of nutricline depth in regulating the ocean carbon cycle , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  S. Strom.  Microbial Ecology of Ocean Biogeochemistry: A Community Perspective , 2008, Science.

[7]  Elena Litchman,et al.  The role of functional traits and trade-offs in structuring phytoplankton communities: scaling from cellular to ecosystem level. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[8]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Mix and match: how climate selects phytoplankton , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[9]  C. Reynolds.  The Ecology of Phytoplankton , 2006 .

[10]  Nicholas R. Bates,et al.  Pelagic functional group modeling: Progress, challenges and prospects , 2006 .

[11]  Nicolas Mouquet,et al.  A Critical Review of Twenty Years’ Use of the Resource‐Ratio Theory , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Paul G. Falkowski,et al.  The Evolution of Modern Eukaryotic Phytoplankton , 2004, Science.

[13]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Historical climate change and ocean turbulence as selective agents for two key phytoplankton functional groups , 2004 .

[14]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Measuring photosynthetic parameters in individual algal cells by Fast Repetition Rate fluorometry , 1999, Photosynthesis Research.

[15]  D. Tilman,et al.  Invasions of equilibria: tests of resource competition using two species of algae , 1984, Oecologia.

[16]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Phytoplankton and Their Role in Primary, New, and Export Production , 2003 .

[17]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Representing key phytoplankton functional groups in ocean carbon cycle models: Coccolithophorids , 2002 .

[18]  S. Doney,et al.  Modelling regional responses by marine pelagic ecosystems to global climate change , 2002 .

[19]  P. Falkowski.  The ocean's invisible forest. , 2002, Scientific American.

[20]  P. Falkowski.  Invisible Marine phytoplankton play a critical role in regulating the earth ’ s climate . Could they also be used to combat global warming ? , 2002 .

[21]  C. Reynolds,et al.  Community Assembly in Marine Phytoplankton: Application of Recent Models to Harmful Dinoflagellate Blooms , 2001 .

[22]  P. Tréguer,et al.  Global change: Silica control of carbon dioxide , 2000, Nature.

[23]  David Archer,et al.  What caused the glacial/interglacial atmospheric pCO2 cycles? , 2000 .

[24]  V. Smetácek,et al.  Diatoms and the ocean carbon cycle. , 1999, Protist.

[25]  Manfred Ehrhardt,et al.  Methods of seawater analysis , 1999 .

[26]  D. Siegel.  Resource competition in a discrete environment: Why are plankton distributions paradoxical? , 1998 .

[27]  J. Huisman,et al.  COMPETITION BETWEEN A PROCHLOROPHYTE AND A CYANOBACTERIUM UNDER VARIOUS PHOSPHORUS REGIMES: COMPARISON WITH THE DROOP MODEL , 1998 .

[28]  T. Legovic,et al.  A model of phytoplankton growth on multiple nutrients based on the Michaelis-Menten-Monod uptake, Droop's growth and Liebig's law , 1997 .

[29]  John A. Raven,et al.  The Vacuole: a Cost-Benefit Analysis , 1997 .

[30]  P. Holligan,et al.  Significance of ocean carbonate budgets for the global carbon cycle , 1996 .

[31]  U. Sommer.  An experimental test of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis using cultures of marine phytoplankton , 1995 .

[32]  R. Riegman,et al.  Effect of phytoplankton cell size on transient-state nitrate and ammonium uptake kinetics. , 1995, Microbiology.

[33]  U. Sommer.  Phytoplankton competition in Plußsee: a field test of the resource-ratio hypothesis , 1993 .

[34]  M. Sieracki,et al.  Plankton community response to sequential silicate and nitrate depletion during the 1989 North Atlantic spring bloom , 1993 .

[35]  D. L. Aksnes,et al.  Silicate as regulating nutrient in phytoplankton competition , 1992 .

[36]  J. Grover.  Dynamics of competition among microalgae in variable environments: experimental tests of alternative models , 1991 .

[37]  James P. Grover,et al.  Resource Competition in a Variable Environment: Phytoplankton Growing According to the Variable-Internal-Stores Model , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[38]  Dag L. Aksnes,et al.  A theoretical model for nutrient uptake in phytoplankton , 1991 .

[39]  J. Grover.  Resource Competition in a Variable Environment: Phytoplankton Growing According to Monod's Model , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[40]  J. Grover.  Effects of Si : P supply ratio, supply variability, and selective grazing in the plankton: An experiment with a natural algal and protistan assemblage. , 1989 .

[41]  J. Grover.  Dynamics of Competition in a Variable Environment: Experiments with Two Diatom Species , 1988 .

[42]  U. Sommer.  Comparison between steady state and non-steady state competition: experiments with natural phytoplankton , 1985 .

[43]  U. Sommer.  Nutrient competition between phyto plankton species in multi species chemostat experiments , 1983 .

[44]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[45]  David Tilman,et al.  Phytoplankton Community Ecology: The Role of Limiting Nutrients , 1982 .

[46]  W. Esaias,et al.  Wind events and food chain dynamics within the New York Bight 1, 2 , 1978 .

[47]  J. Connell.  Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[48]  R. Margalef.  Life-forms of phytoplankton as survival alternatives in an unstable environment , 1978 .

[49]  D. Tilman.  Resource Competition between Plankton Algae: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach , 1977 .

[50]  M. Droop.  SOME THOUGHTS ON NUTRIENT LIMITATION IN ALGAE 1 , 1973 .

[51]  Bruce R. Levin,et al.  Partitioning of Resources and the Outcome of Interspecific Competition: A Model and Some General Considerations , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[52]  P. Richerson,et al.  Contemporaneous disequilibrium, a new hypothesis to explain the "paradox of the plankton". , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .