Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. M. Elliott,et al. Behavior of Organisms , 1991 .
[2] D. Ellson. Successive Extinctions of a Bar-Pressing Response in Rats , 1940 .
[3] J. A. McGeoch. The psychology of human learning , 1942 .
[4] B. Reynolds. Extinction of trace conditioned responses as a function of the spacing of trials during the acquisition and extinction series. , 1945 .
[5] Rohrer Hh. Experimental extinction as a function of the distribution of extinction trials and response strength. , 1947 .
[6] Sheffield Vf. Resistance to extinction as a function of the distribution of extinction trials. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.
[7] N. Munn. Handbook of psychological research on the rat : a introduction to animal psychology / Norman L Munn , 1950 .
[8] K. Spence,et al. Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.
[9] C. I. Hovland. Human learning and retention , 1951 .
[10] R. R. Bush,et al. A Mathematical Model for Simple Learning , 1951 .
[11] M. R. Baron. The effect of long intertrial intervals on the limit of eyelid conditioning. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.
[12] J. Deese. The psychology of learning , 1952 .
[13] W. C. Stanley. Extinction as a function of the spacing of extinction trials. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.
[14] W. Estes,et al. A theory of stimulus variability in learning. , 1953, Psychological review.
[15] C. Osgood. Method and theory in experimental psychology , 1953 .
[16] M. S. Schoeffler. Probability of response to compounds of discriminated stimuli. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.
[17] Studies of distributed practice: XII. Retention following varying degrees of original learning. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.
[18] Estes Wk,et al. Successive acquisitions and extenctions of a jumping habit in relation to schedule of reinforcement. , 1955 .
[19] W. Estes. Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. , 1955, Psychological review.