The Role of Complexity and Symbolization Method in Thematic Map Effectiveness

Abstract Thematic map effectiveness can be defined only in terms of specific user requirements. Consideration of common requirements results in four criteria by which map effectiveness is evaluated: effectiveness for direct acquisition of both specific and general information and for memory of both specific and general information. The influence of visual map complexity and two methods of symbolization (choropleth and shaded isopleth maps) on each aspect of complexity is evaluated. Though isopleth maps prove to be consistently less complex than choropleth maps, the only significant difference in effectiveness between the methods is for memory of general patterns, in which case isopleth maps are more effective. Map complexity is found to have two components that influence effectiveness in quite different ways. Complexity of a mapped distribution is inversely related to effectiveness of maps in communicating general patterns but has little relation to communication of specific details. The second aspect of ...

[1]  Mark Monmonier,et al.  Measures of Pattern Complexity for Choroplethic Maps , 1974 .

[2]  R. E. Lloyd,et al.  The Decisionmaking Process for Judging the Similarity of Choropleth Maps , 1976 .

[3]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Jean-Claude Muller.  PERCEPTION OF CONTINUOUSLY SHADED MAPS , 1979 .

[5]  S. S. Stevens.  The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes-loudness. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  Map Complexity: Comparison and Measurement , 1982 .

[7]  A. Jon Kimerling.  A Cartographic Study of Equal Value Gray Scales for Use With Screened Gray Areas , 1975 .

[8]  J. Flannery.  THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOME COMMON GRADUATED POINT SYMBOLS IN THE PRESENTATION OF QUANTITATIVE DATA , 1971 .

[9]  Michael P. Peterson.  An Evaluation of Unclassed Crossed-Line Choropleth Mapping , 1979 .

[10]  Arthur H. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of Maps: Essays toward Understanding Maps and Mapping , 1976 .

[11]  M. Eagle,et al.  RECALL AND RECOGNITION IN INTENTIONAL AND INCIDENTAL LEARNING. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  Harold H. Mccarty,et al.  VISUAL COMPARISON OF ISOPLETH MAPS AS A MEANS OF DETERMINING CORRELATIONS BETWEEN SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED PHENOMENA , 1961 .

[13]  Paul V. Crawford.  The Perception of Graduated Squares as Cartographic Symbols , 1973 .

[14]  Daniel G. Cole.  Recall vs. Recognition and Task Specificity in Cartographic Psychophysical Testing , 1981 .

[15]  Michael W. Dobson,et al.  Eye Movement Parameters and Map Reading , 1977 .