Possibility Theory as a Basis for Qualitative Decision Theory

A counterpart to von Neumann and Morgenstern' expected utility theory is proposed in the framework of possibility theory. The existence of a utility function, representing a preference ordering among possibility distributions (on the consequences of decision-maker's actions) that satisfies a series of axioms pertaining to decision-maker's behavior, is established. The obtained utility is a generalization of Wald's criterion, which is recovered in case of total ignorance; when ignorance is only partial, the utility takes into account the fact that some situations are more plausible than others. Mathematically, the qualitative utility is nothing but the necessity measure of a fuzzy event in the sense of possibility theory (a so-called Sugeno integral). The possibilistic representation of uncertainty, which only requires a linearly ordered scale, is qualitative in nature. Only max, min and order-reversing operations are used on the scale. The axioms express a risk-averse behavior of the decision maker and correspond to a pessimistic view of what may happen. The proposed qualitative utility function is currently used in flexible constraint satisfaction problems under incomplete information. It can also be used in association with possibilistic logic, which is tailored to reasoning under incomplete states of knowledge.

[1]  Thomas Whalen,et al.  Decisionmaking under uncertainty with various assumptions about available information , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  Hidetomo Ichihashi,et al.  Possibilistic Linear Programming with Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions , 1989, INFORMS J. Comput..

[3]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[4]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy sets and systems , 1990 .

[5]  菅野 道夫,et al.  Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications , 1975 .

[6]  Abraham Wald,et al.  Statistical Decision Functions , 1951 .

[7]  Wolfgang Spohn,et al.  Ordinal Conditional Functions: A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States , 1988 .

[8]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Constructing the Pignistic Probability Function in a Context of Uncertainty , 1989, UAI.

[9]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Specification and Evaluation of Preferences Under Uncertainty , 1994, KR.

[10]  D. Dubois,et al.  Aggregation of decomposable measures with application to utility theory , 1996 .

[11]  D. Dubois Generalized probabilistic independence and its implications for utility , 1986 .

[12]  Representation of preferences on fuzzy measures by a fuzzy integral , 1996 .

[13]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Aggregation of Possibility Measures , 1990 .

[14]  Craig Boutilier,et al.  Toward a Logic for Qualitative Decision Theory , 1994, KR.

[15]  L. Zadeh Calculus of fuzzy restrictions , 1996 .

[16]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Epistemic Entrenchment and Possibilistic Logic , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[17]  G. L. S. Shackle,et al.  Decision Order and Time in Human Affairs , 1962 .

[18]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Representing Default Rules in Possibilistic Logic , 1992, KR.

[19]  Eugene C. Freuder,et al.  Partial Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, IJCAI.

[20]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Fuzzy constraints in job-shop scheduling , 1995, J. Intell. Manuf..

[21]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Representing partial ignorance , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[22]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[23]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Qualitative Decision Theory , 1994, AAAI.

[24]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Automated Reasoning Using Possibilistic Logic: Semantics, Belief Revision, and Variable Certainty Weights , 1994, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[25]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .