Chaos in a predator-prey-based mathematical model for illicit drug consumption

Recently, a mathematical model describing the illicit drug consumption in a population consisting of drug users and non-users has been proposed. The model describes the dynamics of non-users, experimental users, recreational users, and addict users within a population. The aim of this work is to propose a modified version of this model by analogy with the classical predator-prey models, in particular considering non-users as prey and users as predator. Hence, our model includes a stabilizing effect of the growth rate of the prey, and a destabilizing effect of the predator saturation. Functional responses of Verhulst and of Holling type II have been used for modeling these effects. To forecast the marijuana consumption in the states of Colorado and Washington, we used data from Hanley (2013) and a genetic algorithm to calibrate the parameters in our model. Assuming that the population of non-users increases in proportion with the demography, and following the seminal works of Sir Robert May (1976), we use the growth rate of non-users as the main bifurcation parameter. For the state of Colorado, the model first exhibits a limit cycle, which agrees quite accurately with the reported periodic data in Hanley (2013). By further increasing the growth rate of non-users, the population then enters into two chaotic regions, within which the evolution of the variables becomes unpredictable. For the state of Washington, the model also exhibits a periodic solution, which is again in good agreement with observed data. A chaotic region for Washington is likewise observed in the bifurcation diagram. Our research confirms that mathematical models can be a useful tool for better understanding illicit drug consumption, and for guiding policy-makers towards more effective policies to contain this epidemic.

[1]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors , 1985 .

[3]  Y. Kuznetsov Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[4]  C. S. Holling Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[5]  Rajan Batta,et al.  Modeling the response of illicit drug markets to local enforcement , 1993 .

[6]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  Joseph W.-H. So,et al.  Global stability and persistence of simple food chains , 1985 .

[8]  V. Volterra Fluctuations in the Abundance of a Species considered Mathematically , 1926, Nature.

[9]  Robert M. May,et al.  Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications , 1981 .

[10]  Vito Volterra,et al.  Leçons sur la théorie mathématique de la lutte pour la vie , 1931 .

[11]  M. Z. Dauhoo,et al.  An Analysis of the Dynamical Evolution of Experimental, Recreative and Abusive Marijuana Consumption in the States of Colorado and Washington Beyond the Implementation of I–502 , 2015 .

[12]  Fumio Nakajima The paradox of enrichment , 2008 .

[13]  Jonathan P. Caulkins,et al.  Local Drug Markets' Response to Focused Police Enforcement , 1993, Oper. Res..

[14]  Robert M. May,et al.  Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics , 1976, Nature.

[15]  P. J. Hughesdon,et al.  The Struggle for Existence , 1927, Nature.

[16]  A. Wolf,et al.  Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series , 1985 .

[17]  Jonathan P. Caulkins,et al.  Geography's impact on the success of focused local drug enforcement operations , 1993 .

[18]  M. Rosenzweig Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[19]  Georges b. Teissier,et al.  Vérifications expérimentales de la théorie mathématique de la lutte pour la vie , 1935 .

[20]  V. Volterra Variations and Fluctuations of the Number of Individuals in Animal Species living together , 1928 .

[21]  C. S. Holling The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[22]  S. Rinaldi,et al.  Dynamics of Drug Consumption: a Theoretical Model , 1997 .

[23]  J. Ginoux The paradox of Vito Volterra’s predator-prey model , 2017, 1808.05117.