TRAFFIC CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR CONGESTED FREEWAYS AND WORK ZONES

The primary objective of the research was to identify and evaluate effective ways of improving traffic operations and safety on congested freeways. There was particular interest in finding condition-responsive traffic control solutions for the following problem areas: (1) end-of-queue warning, (2) work zones with lane closure, and (3) queue spillover at exit ramps. Available techniques considered by this research include combination of static and dynamic queue warning systems, dynamic merge control in advance of freeway lane closures, and various traffic control strategies, such as traffic diversion and ramp metering, to mitigate queue spillover at exit ramps. Three sets of evaluation studies were conducted: first, two queue warning systems deployed on IH 610 and US 59 in Houston, Texas, were evaluated based on field observations. Second, strategies to resolve a ramp spillover problem at an exit ramp in El Paso, Texas, were analyzed using traffic simulations. Third, the Dynamic Merge work zone traffic control concept was evaluated using traffic simulations, and recommendations were developed for its potential use for various work zone types with different lane closure configurations.

[1]  Patrick T McCoy,et al.  Effectiveness of Condition-Responsive Advisory Speed Messages in Rural Freeway Work Zones , 2002 .

[2]  Steven E. Shladover,et al.  Rear-End Collision–Warning System: Design and Evaluation via Simulation , 2001 .

[3]  Peter T Martin,et al.  ADVERSE VISIBILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM EVALUATION (ADVISE): INTERSTATE 215 FOG WARNING SYSTEM , 2003 .

[4]  Suzanne E. Lee,et al.  Evolution of an Enhanced Rear Signaling System , 2003 .

[5]  Patrick T McCoy,et al.  Dynamic Late Merge–Control Concept for Work Zones on Rural Interstate Highways , 2001 .

[6]  H G Hawkins,et al.  INNOVATIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE IN EUROPE , 1999 .

[7]  Christopher B. Winkler,et al.  Work Zone Safety ITS Smart Barrel for an Adaptive Queue-Warning System , 2005 .

[8]  Alan R Kaub,et al.  AUTOMATIC SPEED MONITOR: AN INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEM SAFE-SPEED SYSTEM FOR ADVANCE WARNING OR HAZARDOUS SPEED MONITORING , 1993 .

[9]  S Matano Kujirai.  INTRODUCTION OF CONGESTION TAIL DISPLAY SYSTEM INTO METROPOLITAN EXPRESSWAY , 1998 .

[10]  K. Nagel,et al.  TRANSIMS traffic flow characteristics , 1997, adap-org/9710003.

[11]  Mark Jensen,et al.  Evaluation of the intelligent cruise control system : volume 1 : study results , 1999 .

[12]  Jeffrey H. Everson,et al.  RUN-OFF-ROAD COLLISION AVOIDANCE USING IVHS COUNTERMEASURES FINAL REPORT. , 1999 .

[13]  A. Hegyi,et al.  Optimal Coordination of Variable Speed Limits to Suppress Shock Waves , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[14]  Ali Kamyab,et al.  CAPACITY OF FREEWAY WORK ZONE LANE CLOSURES , 2000 .

[15]  C. Fuhs,et al.  Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management , 2007 .

[16]  Nagui M. Rouphail,et al.  INTEGRATING MICROSCOPIC SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION: APPLICATION TO FREEWAY WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL , 1990 .

[17]  Virginia P Sisiopiku,et al.  ACTIVE WARNING SYSTEMS: SYNTHESIS , 2005 .

[18]  Fred R Hanscom.  WEIGHT-SPECIFIC HIGHWAY SIGN EFFECTS ON HEAVY TRUCKS , 1987 .

[19]  Patrick T McCoy,et al.  Traffic Flow Characteristics of the Late Merge Work Zone Control Strategy , 1999 .

[20]  H. Ikeda,et al.  Introduction of congestion tail display system into Metropolitan Expressway , 1999, Proceedings 199 IEEE/IEEJ/JSAI International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (Cat. No.99TH8383).

[21]  C H Walters,et al.  ADVANCE WARNING OF STOPPED TRAFFIC ON FREEWAYS: CURRENT PRACTICES AND FIELD STUDIES OF QUEUE PROPAGATION SPEEDS , 2003 .

[22]  Conrad L Dudek,et al.  Sequential Warning-Light System for Work-Zone Lane Closures , 2001 .

[23]  Patrick T McCoy,et al.  ALTERNATIVE DRIVER INFORMATION TO ALLEVIATE WORK-ZONE-RELATED DELAYS , 1999 .

[24]  D Deeter,et al.  TECHNOLOGY FOR RURAL TRANSPORTATION: "SIMPLE SOLUTIONS" , 1997 .

[25]  Deborah L Jasek,et al.  Strategies for Separating Trucks from Passenger Vehicles: Final Report , 2006 .

[26]  Steven D Schrock,et al.  A REVIEW OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND ENFORCEMENT PROBLEMS AND IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS AT HIGH-VOLUME, HIGH-SPEED WORK ZONES IN TEXAS , 2001 .

[27]  Andrzej P. Tarko,et al.  MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION OF THE INDIANA LANE MERGE CONTROL SYSTEM ON APPROACHES TO FREEWAY WORK ZONES. PART I , 1998 .

[28]  Chris Lee,et al.  Real-Time Crash Prediction Model for Application to Crash Prevention in Freeway Traffic , 2002 .

[29]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Evaluation of variable speed limits for real-time freeway safety improvement. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  E. van den Hoogen,et al.  Control by variable speed signs: results of the Dutch experiment , 1994 .

[31]  Juan Zhicai,et al.  Simulation research and implemented effect analysis of variable speed limits on freeway , 2004, Proceedings. The 7th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8749).

[32]  P Pisano,et al.  BEST PRACTICES FOR ROAD WEATHER MANAGEMENT, VERSION 2.0 , 2003 .

[33]  Kyeong-Pyo Kang,et al.  Dynamic Late Merge Control at Highway Work Zones: Evaluation, Observations, and Suggestions , 2005 .

[34]  Andrzej P. Tarko,et al.  SAFETY AND CAPACITY EVALUATION OF THE INDIANA LANE MERGE SYSTEM , 2001 .

[35]  Thorsten Kathmann.  ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ACTIVE SPEED WARNING SIGNS - USE OF INDUCTIVE LOOP DATA OR EMPIRICAL DATA? , 2001 .

[36]  Nagui M. Rouphail,et al.  LANE CLOSURES AT FREEWAY WORK ZONES: SIMULATION STUDY , 1982 .