Evaluating the Potential of Design for Additive Manufacturing Heuristic Cards to Stimulate Novel Product Redesigns

Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) affords those who wield it correctly the benefits of shape, material, hierarchical, and functional complexity. However, many engineers and designers lack the training and experience necessary to take full advantage of these benefits. They require training, tools, and methods to assist them in gaining the enhanced design freedom made possible by additive manufacturing. This work, which is an extension of the authors’ previous work, explores if design heuristics for AM, presented in a card-based format, are an effective mechanism for helping designers achieve the design freedoms enabled by AM. The effectiveness of these design heuristic cards is demonstrated in an experiment with 27 product design students, by showing that there is an increase in the number of unique capabilities of AM being utilized, an increase in the AM novelty, and an increase in the AM flexibility of the generated concepts, when given access to the cards. Additionally, similar to the previous work, an increase in the number of interpreted heuristics and AM modifications present in the participants’ designs when they are provided with the heuristic cards is shown. Comparisons are also made between 8-heuristic and 29-heuristic experiments, but no conclusive statements regarding these comparisons can be drawn. Further user studies are planned to confirm the efficacy of this format at enhancing the design freedoms achieved in group and team design scenarios.

[1]  W RosenDavid,et al.  The Roadmap for Additive Manufacturing and Its Impact , 2014 .

[2]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  The need for effective design guides in additive manufacturing , 2017 .

[3]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[4]  F. Martina,et al.  Design for Additive Manufacturing , 2019 .

[5]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities in Design for Additive Manufacturing , 2014 .

[6]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  The Earlier the Better? Investigating the Importance of Timing on Effectiveness of Design for Additive Manufacturing Education , 2018, Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference.

[7]  Yaoyao Fiona Zhao,et al.  Understanding the Role of Additive Manufacturing Knowledge in Stimulating Design Innovation for Novice Designers , 2018, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[8]  Kristina Shea,et al.  Design Heuristics for Additive Manufacturing Validated Through a User Study1 , 2019, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[9]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming , 2017 .

[10]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Supporting novice engineers in idea generation using Design Heuristics , 2017 .

[11]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Statistical Methods for Communication Science , 2005 .

[12]  Guido A.O. Adam,et al.  Design for Additive Manufacturing—Element transitions and aggregated structures , 2014 .

[13]  Laverne Floriane,et al.  Enriching design with X through tailored additive manufacturing knowledge: a methodological proposal , 2017 .

[14]  Nabil Anwer,et al.  Assembly Based Methods to Support Product Innovation in Design for Additive Manufacturing: An Exploratory Case Study , 2015 .

[15]  Kristina Shea,et al.  Designing passive dynamic walking robots for additive manufacture , 2015 .

[16]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  CROWDSOURCED DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR LEVERAGING THE CAPABILITIES OF ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING , 2015 .

[17]  Thomas Vietor,et al.  Methods and tools for identifying and leveraging additive manufacturing design potentials , 2018 .

[18]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Design for Additive Manufacturing , 2015, Additive Manufacturing Technologies.

[19]  Thomas Vietor,et al.  A methodical approach to support ideation for additive manufacturing in design education , 2017 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .