GIS AND GAME THEORY FOR WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Abstract. In this study, aspects of Game theory and its application on water resources management combined with GIS techniques are detailed. First, each term is explained and the advantages and limitations of its aspect is discussed. Then, the nature of combinations between each pair and literature on the previous studies are given. Several cases were investigated and results were magnified in order to conclude with the applicability and combination of GIS- Game Theory- Water Resources Management. It is concluded that the game theory is used relatively in limited studies of water management fields such as cost/benefit allocation among users, water allocation among trans-boundary users in water resources, water quality management, groundwater management, analysis of water policies, fair allocation of water resources development cost and some other narrow fields. Also, Decision-making in environmental projects requires consideration of trade-offs between socio-political, environmental, and economic impacts and is often complicated by various stakeholder views. Most of the literature on water allocation and conflict problems uses traditional optimization models to identify the most efficient scheme while the Game Theory, as an optimization method, combined GIS are beneficial platforms for agent based models to be used in solving Water Resources Management problems in the further studies.

[1]  David B. Paradice,et al.  The Effects of Integrating Cognitive Feedback and Multi-attribute Utility-Based Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods in GDSS , 1999 .

[2]  Nils Rosmuller,et al.  Group decision making in infrastructure safety planning , 2004 .

[3]  Rob Feick,et al.  Consensus-building in a Multi-Participant Spatial Decision Support System , 1999 .

[4]  Kaveh Madani,et al.  Game theory and water resources , 2010 .

[5]  Colin Fyfe,et al.  A GIS AND WEB-BASED DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF URBAN SOILS , 2004, Cybern. Syst..

[6]  G. Brent Hall,et al.  BALANCING CONSENSUS AND CONFLICT WITH A GIS-BASED MULTI-PARTICIPANT, MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION SUPPORT TOOL , 2003 .

[7]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  David A. Bennett,et al.  Exploring the Solution Space of Semi‐structured Geographical Problems Using Genetic Algorithms , 1999, Trans. GIS.

[9]  Roger A. McCain,et al.  GAME THEORY:A Nontechnical Introduction to the Analysis of Strategy(Revised Edition) , 2010 .

[10]  T. Nyerges,et al.  Geographic information systems for group decision making : towards a participatory, geographic information science , 2001 .

[11]  J. E. de Steiguer,et al.  AHP as a means for improving public participation: a pre-post experiment with university students , 2005 .

[12]  Mohammad Sharifi,et al.  Application of GIS and multicriteria evaluation in locating sustainable boundary between the tunari National Park and Cochabamba City (Bolivia) , 2002 .

[13]  Joan E. Luther,et al.  GIS-Based Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis , 2011 .

[14]  Maria Franca Norese,et al.  Group decision and distributed technical support , 2004 .

[15]  Peter A. Kwaku Kyem,et al.  An Application of a Choice Heuristic Algorithm for Managing Land Resource Allocation Problems Involving Multiple Parties and Conflicting Interests , 2001, Trans. GIS.