The Development of Linear Ordering Preferences in Child Language: The Influence of Accessibility and Topicality

When communicating with their interlocutors, adults have a robust preference to order previously mentioned (‘old’) referents in the discourse before mentioning referents that have not yet been introduced in the discourse (‘new’). But in an experimental study investigating phrasal conjuncts, 3- to 5-year-olds acquiring German exhibit a ‘new-old’ ordering preference (Narasimhan & Dimroth, 2008), suggesting that the ‘old-new’ preference does not have early cognitive roots but changes over the course of development. Here we ask the following: When does children's ordering preference switch from the ‘new-old’ to the adult-like ‘old-new’ pattern? And can we change 4-year-olds' ‘new-old’ preference by making the ‘old’ referent more topical in the discourse? Findings show that by the age of 9 years, children have switched their preference to ‘old-new’ (Study 1). But despite discourse encouragement to use the ‘old-new’ order, younger children continue to prefer the ‘new-old’ order (Study 2). Children's non-adultlike ordering preference is robust and persists until later childhood. Factors such as exposure to the ambient language and/or cognitive maturation are likely to play a role in the development of the ‘old-new’ order in children.

[1]  P. Hornby Surface Structure and the Topic-Comment Distinction: A Developmental Study. , 1971 .

[2]  E. Bates Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics , 1976 .

[3]  M. Braine Children's First Word Combinations. , 1976 .

[4]  M. Maratsos The Use of Definite and Indefinite Reference in Young Children: An Experimental Study of Semantic Acquisition , 1976 .

[5]  P. Johnson-Laird Book Review: The Use of Definite and Indefinite Reference in Young Children , 1977 .

[6]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: A cross-cultural developmental study , 1978 .

[7]  S. Pinker,et al.  Speakers' sensitivity to rules of frozen word order , 1979 .

[8]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production , 1980 .

[9]  H. Emslie,et al.  Pre-school children's use of the articles in definite and indefinite referring expressions , 1981, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  T. Reinhart Pragmatics and Linguistics: an analysis of Sentence Topics , 1981, Philosophica.

[11]  Annette Karmiloff-Smith Language acquisition: Some fundamental aspects of language development after age 5 , 1986 .

[12]  P. Greenfield,et al.  The development of new and old information in young children's early language , 1988 .

[13]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[14]  C. Fisher,et al.  The Given-New Contract in Speech to Infants , 1995 .

[15]  A. Sorace,et al.  Animacy effects on the production of object-dislocated descriptions by Catalan-speaking children , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[17]  S. Allen A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut , 2000 .

[18]  Jeannette Schaeffer,et al.  The Acquisition of Direct Object Scrambling and Clitic Placement: Syntax and pragmatics , 2000 .

[19]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Given-New Versus New-Given?: An analysis of reading times for spatial descriptions , 2000 .

[20]  C. Graumann,et al.  Perspective and perspectivation in discourse , 2002 .

[21]  Hannelore Grimm Replik auf die Testbesprechung von Ulrike Willinger: Grimm, H. & Doil, H. (2000). ELFRA. Elternfragebögen für die Früherkennung von Risikokindern. Göttingen: Hogrefe. , 2002 .

[22]  W. Klein,et al.  Quaestio and L-perspectivation , 2002 .

[23]  J. Paradis,et al.  Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: what is the role of the input? , 2003, Journal of child language.

[24]  Victor S Ferreira,et al.  Given-New Ordering Effects on the Production of Scrambled Sentences in Japanese , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[25]  C. Fisher,et al.  Who’s “she”? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns☆ , 2005 .

[26]  N. Budwig,et al.  Argument realization in Hindi caregiver¿child discourse , 2005 .

[27]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[28]  L. Serratrice The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian , 2005 .

[29]  C. Dimroth,et al.  Word order and information status in child language , 2008, Cognition.

[30]  Marit Westergaard,et al.  The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, Information Structure, and Economy , 2009 .

[31]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[32]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Markers of Discourse Structure in Child-Directed Speech , 2011, CogSci.

[33]  Shu-ing Shyu Topic and Focus , 2014 .

[34]  J. Hay,et al.  Ladies First , 2019, Pastime Lost.