Identification of effective engineering methods for controlling handheld workpiece vibration in grinding processes.

Abstract The objective of this study is to identify effective engineering methods for controlling handheld workpiece vibration during grinding processes. Prolonged and intensive exposures to such vibration can cause hand-arm vibration syndrome among workers performing workpiece grinding, but how to effectively control these exposures remains an important issue. This study developed a methodology for performing their analyses and evaluations based on a model of the entire grinding machine-workpiece-hand-arm system. The model can simulate the vibration responses of a workpiece held in the worker's hands and pressed against a grinding wheel in order to shape the workpiece in the major frequency range of concern (6.3–1600 Hz). The methodology was evaluated using available experimental data. The results suggest that the methodology is acceptable for these analyses and evaluations. The results also suggest that the workpiece vibration resulting from the machine vibration generally depends on two mechanisms or pathways: (1) the direct vibration transmission from the grinding machine; and (2) the indirect transmission that depends on both the machine vibration transmission to the workpiece and the interface excitation transformation to the workpiece vibration. The methodology was applied to explore and/or analyze various engineering methods for controlling workpiece vibrations. The modeling results suggest that while these intervention methods have different advantages and limitations, some of their combinations can effectively reduce the vibration exposures of grinding workers. These findings can be used as guidance for selecting and developing more effective technologies to control handheld workpiece vibration exposures.

[1]  Christopher Warren,et al.  The Effect of a Mechanical Arm System on Portable Grinder Vibration Emissions. , 2016, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[2]  Bin Xiao,et al.  Vibration characteristics of golf club heads in their handheld grinding process and potential approaches for reducing the vibration exposure. , 2017, International journal of industrial ergonomics.

[3]  Christian Brecher,et al.  Modelling and simulation of process: machine interaction in grinding , 2009, Prod. Eng..

[4]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[5]  W. Pawłowski,et al.  The influence of grinding process on forced vibration damping in headstock of grinding wheel of cylindrical grinder , 1999 .

[6]  K. Ikeda,et al.  Vibration acceleration magnitudes of hand-held tools and workpieces. , 1998, Industrial health.

[7]  Thomas W. McDowell,et al.  An evaluation of the proposed revision of the anti-vibration glove test method defined in ISO 10819 (1996) , 2012 .

[8]  Hans Kurt Tönshoff,et al.  Noise and Vibration in Belt Grinding at Contact Wheels , 1982 .

[9]  Qingsong Chen,et al.  A model for simulating vibration responses of grinding machine-workpiece-hand-arm systems , 2018, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[10]  João Fernando Gomes de Oliveira,et al.  Experimental analysis of wheel/workpiece dynamic interactions in grinding , 2008 .

[11]  Richard P. Lindsay,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF PROCESS VARIABLES ON MATERIAL REMOVAL, SURFACE INTEGRITY, SURFACE FINISH AND VIBRATION IN GRINDING , 1970 .

[12]  R. Dandanell,et al.  Vibration from riveting tools in the frequency range 6 Hz-10 MHz and Raynaud's phenomenon. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[13]  Ren G Dong,et al.  Development of a finger adapter method for testing and evaluating vibration-reducing gloves and materials. , 2019, Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation.

[14]  J Starck,et al.  Physical characteristics of vibration in relation to vibration-induced white finger. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.