Smart nest box: a tool and methodology for monitoring of cavity‐dwelling animals

Summary Camera recording and video analysis have emerged as a successful non-invasive method for collecting a wide range of biological data on many different taxa of animals. However, camera monitoring has rarely been applied to long-term surveillance of cavity or box-nesting species and ordinary off-the-shelf cameras are employed. We present methodology and data on the effectiveness of nest box monitoring using a camera system embedded in four ‘smart nest boxes’ (SNBoxes). We applied the SNBoxes to eight Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) nests in the Czech Republic during a 5-month period in 2014. Each SNBox consisted of a pair of cameras with infrared lighting, an event detector, a radiofrequency identification reader, auxiliary sensors and a 60 Ah 12 V battery to power the whole system. All devices used were centrally managed by an embedded computer with specifically developed software. Using four SNBoxes, we observed owl nesting continually during the incubation, nestling and fledgling phases, in total 309 days, resulting in 3382 owl video events. Batteries were changed every 6·5 days. A memory of 4 GB was found sufficient to store monthly data. We identified 12 types of male and female parental activities and their timing, the diet composition and frequency of prey delivery, the manner of prey storage, the light intensity at the time of each parental activity, the temperature inside the clutch and outside the box and the duration of nestling period of each young. We also produced a video on owl nesting for the general public. The SNBox and related methodology show enormous potential as a non-invasive tool for monitoring animals using boxes or natural cavities. The main advantage of the SNBox is the possibility to study both nocturnal and diurnal animal species and great flexibility in use of the software and hardware for different tasks. As a result, the SNBox provides an opportunity for novel insights into the breeding, roosting, hibernating, and food storage activities of a wide range of cavity-living birds, mammals and reptiles.

[1]  W. Cresswell,et al.  Latitudinal variation in day length and working day length has a confounding effect when comparing nest attentiveness in tropical and temperate species , 2014, Journal of Ornithology.

[2]  K. Stastný,et al.  Reproductive responses of temperate and boreal Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus populations to spatial and temporal variation in prey availability , 2015 .

[3]  Markéta Zárybnická,et al.  Parental Investment of Female Tengmalm's Owls Aegolius funereus: Correlation with Varying Food Abundance and Reproductive Success , 2009 .

[4]  T. E. Martin,et al.  Effects of ambient temperature on avian incubation behavior , 2000 .

[5]  M. Griesser,et al.  Dark or Short Nights: Differential Latitudinal Constraints in Nestling Provisioning Patterns of a Nocturnally Hunting Bird Species , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Emmanuel Do Linh San,et al.  Nest box use by woodland dormice (Graphiurus murinus): the influence of life cycle and nest box placement , 2010, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[7]  Charalampos Z. Patrikakis,et al.  A complete farm management system based on animal identification using RFID technology , 2010 .

[8]  Robert A. Miller,et al.  Effects of Prey Abundance on Breeding Season Diet of Northern Goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) Within an Unusual Prey Landscape , 2014 .

[9]  Franck Trolliet,et al.  Use of camera traps for wildlife studies. A review , 2014 .

[10]  Vitali Reif,et al.  Using time-lapse digital video recording for a nesting study of birds of prey , 2006, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[11]  J. Bustamante,et al.  Factors influencing family rupture and parent‐offspring conflict in the Black Kite Milvus migrans , 2008 .

[12]  J. Riegert,et al.  The role of Apodemus mice and Microtus voles in the diet of the Tengmalm’s owl in Central Europe , 2013, Population Ecology.

[13]  P. Weatherhead,et al.  Power lines, roads, and avian nest survival: effects on predator identity and predation intensity , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[14]  Shortening day length as a previously unrecognized selective pressure for early breeding in a bird with long parental care , 2015, Journal of Ornithology.

[15]  O. Sedláček,et al.  Do Tengmalm’s Owls alter parental feeding effort under varying conditions of main prey availability? , 2008, Journal of Ornithology.

[16]  V. Remeš,et al.  Winter Night Inspections of Nest Boxes Affect their Occupancy and Reuse for Roosting by Cavity Nesting Birds , 2012 .

[17]  J. Vojar,et al.  Effect of male provisioning on the parental behavior of female Boreal Owls Aegolius funereus , 2013, Zoological Studies.

[18]  T. Cutler Using remote photography in wildlife ecology : a review , 1999 .

[19]  Alfonso Alonso,et al.  Arboreal camera trapping: taking a proven method to new heights , 2014 .

[20]  Shengxiang Zhang,et al.  Sex-Specific Parental Care Strategies Via Nestling Age: Females Pay More Attention to Nestling Demands than Males Do in the Horned Lark, Eremophila alpestris , 2014, Zoological science.

[21]  C. Nielsen,et al.  A Remote Videography System for Monitoring Beavers , 2009 .

[22]  H. Richner,et al.  Begging signals and biparental care: nestling choice between parental feeding locations , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Luca Catarinucci,et al.  Smart RFID Antenna System for Indoor Tracking and Behavior Analysis of Small Animals in Colony Cages , 2014, IEEE Sensors Journal.