Macroscopic hotspots identification: A Bayesian spatio-temporal interaction approach.

This study proposes a Bayesian spatio-temporal interaction approach for hotspot identification by applying the full Bayesian (FB) technique in the context of macroscopic safety analysis. Compared with the emerging Bayesian spatial and temporal approach, the Bayesian spatio-temporal interaction model contributes to a detailed understanding of differential trends through analyzing and mapping probabilities of area-specific crash trends as differing from the mean trend and highlights specific locations where crash occurrence is deteriorating or improving over time. With traffic analysis zones (TAZs) crash data collected in Florida, an empirical analysis was conducted to evaluate the following three approaches for hotspot identification: FB ranking using a Poisson-lognormal (PLN) model, FB ranking using a Bayesian spatial and temporal (B-ST) model and FB ranking using a Bayesian spatio-temporal interaction (B-ST-I) model. The results show that (a) the models accounting for space-time effects perform better in safety ranking than does the PLN model, and (b) the FB approach using the B-ST-I model significantly outperforms the B-ST approach in correctly identifying hotspots by explicitly accounting for the space-time variation in addition to the stable spatial/temporal patterns of crash occurrence. In practice, the B-ST-I approach plays key roles in addressing two issues: (a) how the identified hotspots have evolved over time and (b) the identification of areas that, whilst not yet hotspots, show a tendency to become hotspots. Finally, it can provide guidance to policy decision makers to efficiently improve zonal-level safety.

[1]  Robert Haining,et al.  Space–time variability in burglary risk: A Bayesian spatio-temporal modelling approach , 2014 .

[2]  L H Nitz,et al.  Spatial analysis of Honolulu motor vehicle crashes: I. Spatial patterns. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  D. Clayton,et al.  Bayesian analysis of space-time variation in disease risk. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Wen Cheng,et al.  Experimental evaluation of hotspot identification methods. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Depth-based hotspot identification and multivariate ranking using the full Bayes approach. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Sensitivity analysis in the context of regional safety modeling: identifying and assessing the modifiable areal unit problem. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety , 1997 .

[8]  R W Stokes,et al.  Rate-Quality Control Method of Identifying Hazardous Road Locations , 1996 .

[9]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  BAYES AND EMPIRICAL BAYES METHODS FOR DATA ANALYSIS , 1996, Stat. Comput..

[10]  Alfonso Montella,et al.  A comparative analysis of hotspot identification methods. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Robert C. Deen,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS RURAL HIGHWAY LOCATIONS , 1975 .

[12]  Wen Cheng,et al.  New Criteria for Evaluating Methods of Identifying Hot Spots , 2008 .

[13]  Qiang Zeng,et al.  Bayesian spatial joint modeling of traffic crashes on an urban road network. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Screening the Road Network for Sites with Promise , 2002 .

[15]  Helai Huang,et al.  Evaluating Spatial-Proximity Structures in Crash Prediction Models at the Level of Traffic Analysis Zones , 2014 .

[16]  Ezra Hauer Identification of Sites with Promise , 1996 .

[17]  Md. Mazharul Haque,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Approaches in Identifying Crash Hot Spots , 2009 .

[18]  Helai Huang,et al.  Road network safety evaluation using Bayesian hierarchical joint model. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Jane Law,et al.  Analyzing Hotspots of Crime Using a Bayesian Spatiotemporal Modeling Approach: A Case Study of Violent Crime in the Greater Toronto Area , 2015 .

[20]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Multilevel data and bayesian analysis in traffic safety. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Fully Bayesian Approach to Investigate and Evaluate Ranking Criteria for Black Spot Identification , 2011 .

[22]  Shaw-Pin Miaou,et al.  Bayesian ranking of sites for engineering safety improvements: decision parameter, treatability concept, statistical criterion, and spatial dependence. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[24]  Pengpeng Xu,et al.  Modeling crash spatial heterogeneity: random parameter versus geographically weighting. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Geographical unit based analysis in the context of transportation safety planning , 2013 .

[26]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[27]  Richard N Smith,et al.  THE SAFETY INDEX: A METHOD OF EVALUATING AND RATING SAFETY BENEFITS , 1970 .

[28]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Bayesian spatio-temporal analysis of joint patterns of male and female lung cancer risks in Yorkshire (UK) , 2006, Statistical methods in medical research.

[29]  Peter Congdon,et al.  Applied Bayesian Modelling , 2003 .

[30]  Helai Huang,et al.  Support vector machine in crash prediction at the level of traffic analysis zones: Assessing the spatial proximity effects. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Application of Poisson random effect models for highway network screening. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Multi-level hot zone identification for pedestrian safety. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.