Functional equivalence of masking and cue reduction in perception of shape at a slant

In a backward masking paradigm Epstein, Hatfield, and Muise (1977) found that presentation of a frontoparallel pattern mask caused the perceived shape of elliptical figures which were rotated in depth to conform to a projective shape function. The current study extended the masking function by examining the effect of a mask which was partially or wholly cotemporal with the target. The study also assessed the functional equivalence of the masking treatment and the conventional treatment for minimizing depth information. Reports of perceived shape and perceived orientation were obtained under three conditions: binocular without mask, binocular with mask, monocular without mask. Under the first condition, perceived shape conformed to objective shape and perceived orientation was proportional to objective orientation. Under the latter two conditions, perceived shape was in very close agreement to projective shape and the two functions did not differ. Orientation was underestimated greatly under both conditions. We concluded that the effect of the mask on perceived shape is mediated by its effect on encoding of orientation information, although an additional effect on the subsequent stage of shape-slant integration cannot be excluded.

[1]  O Braddick,et al.  Orientation-Specific Learning in Stereopsis , 1973, Perception.

[2]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perceived shape at a slant as a function of processing time and processing load. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  W. Epstein Attitudes of judgment and the size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1963 .

[4]  W. Epstein,et al.  The Process of ‘Taking-into-Account’ in Visual Perception , 1973, Perception.

[5]  P. Kaiser,et al.  Perceived shape and its dependency on perceived slant. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  G N Seagrim Stereoscopic vision and aniseikonic lenses. II. , 1967, British journal of psychology.

[7]  I. Biederman,et al.  Shape constancy and a perceptual bias towards symmetry , 1976 .

[8]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[9]  W. Epstein,et al.  Shape constancy: Functional relationships and theoretical formulations. , 1963 .

[10]  W. A. Winnick,et al.  ROLE OF APPARENT SLANT IN SHAPE JDGMENTS. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  W. Epstein,et al.  The induction of nonveridical slant and the perception of shape. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  W. Gogel,et al.  EQUIDISTANCE TENDENCY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Equidistance effects in visual fields. , 1969, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  John P. Frisby,et al.  Learning to See Complex Random-Dot Stereograms , 1975 .

[15]  J. Gibson,et al.  The relation of apparent shape to apparent slant in the perception of objects. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.