Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model

Abstract E-learning has become progressively more vital for academia and corporate training and has potentially become one of the most significant developments and applications in Information Technologies (ITs). This study used a quantitative approach seeking a causative explanation of the decision behavior of individuals toward the acceptance and assimilation of e-learning in academic settings. A survey of 286 participants (students) was conducted to collect the research data. Our study framework was based on the third version of the Technology Acceptance Model (i.e., TAM3) and the data were analyzed using structural equation modeling in order to determine the factors that influence the learners’ intention to use e-learning. Results show the predicting (promoting/inhibiting) factors of e-learning technology acceptance, while also examining some related post-implementation interventions expected to contribute to the acceptance and assimilation of e-learning systems. Our results also indicate that TAM3 holds well in the Arabian culture and also outline valuable outcomes such as: managerial interventions and controls for better organizational e-learning management that can lead to greater acceptance and effective utilization. Hopefully, this study provides a roadmap to more understanding of the success factors and post-implementation interventions contributing to the acceptance and assimilation of e-learning systems in developing countries.

[1]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[2]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Reexamining a Model for Evaluating Information Center Success Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach , 1997 .

[3]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[5]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[6]  A. Bryman,et al.  Business Research Methods , 2004 .

[7]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  이훈,et al.  지각된 유용성(Perceived Usefulness)의 영향분석 , 2004 .

[9]  Abdulrahman A. Mirza,et al.  Models of e-learning adopted in the Middle East , 2011 .

[10]  Peter R. Newsted,et al.  Survey Instruments in Information Systems , 1998, MIS Q..

[11]  Jijie Wang,et al.  Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[13]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Cultural Impacts on Acceptance and Adoption of Information Technology in a Developing Country , 2010, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[14]  Pamela E. Carter,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceputalization of the Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with IT-Enabled Work Systems , 2005 .

[15]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[17]  Khlood Al-Siraihi Al-Harbi e-Learning in the Saudi tertiary education: Potential and challenges , 2011 .

[18]  William R. Darden,et al.  Causal Models in Marketing , 1980 .

[19]  A. Al-Adwan,et al.  Exploring Students Acceptance of E-Learning Using Technology Acceptance Model in Jordanian Universities. , 2013 .

[20]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[22]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 1996, ICIS.

[23]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[24]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on "Quo Vadis TAM - Issues and Reflections on Technology Acceptance Research" , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus , 2001, MIS Q..

[26]  R. Rosenfeld Belief , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[27]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[28]  Abdel Elah Al-Ayyoub,et al.  Students' Decisions to Use an eLearning System: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis , 2009, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[29]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[30]  Samiul Islam,et al.  Mobile Learning in Saudi Arabia – Prospects and Challenges , 2011 .

[31]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[32]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[33]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Glenn Hardaker,et al.  Barriers and enablers to adoption and diffusion of eLearning , 2014 .

[35]  Hassan M. Selim,et al.  An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[37]  R. Brislin The wording and translation of research instruments. , 1986 .

[38]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[39]  Mammo Muchie,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on: Building Capacity to Develop and Use Science, Technology and innovation Indicators , 2012 .

[40]  M. Seliaman,et al.  Mobile Learning Adoption in Saudi Arabia , 2012 .

[41]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  B. Bjerke,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: Management in Saudi Arabia , 1993 .

[43]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[44]  Said S. Al-Gahtani,et al.  Testing for the Applicability of the TAM Model in the Arabic Context: Exploring an Extended TAM with Three Moderating Factors , 2008, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[45]  Tsungjuang Wang,et al.  Rethinking teaching with information and communication technologies (ICTs) in architectural education , 2009 .

[46]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[47]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..