Interrelations between psychoacoustical tuning curves and spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.

With the hypothesis that cochlear active mechanisms are the origin of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and of the high frequency selectivity exhibited by the ear, psychoacoustical tuning curves (PTCs), transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) have been examined in 50 normal hearing subjects. Using a clinical simplified method, PTCs were successively assessed at three frequencies--1, 2 and 4 kHz--in each subject. The results showed the existence of significant differences in the quality of tuning (Q10dB) of the PTCs between, first, subjects having SOAEs and subjects having no SOAEs (Student's t-test; p < 0.05; df = 35) and, second, subjects having large TEOAEs and subjects having small TEOAEs (Student's t-test; p < 0.05; df = 14). Nevertheless, these significant differences did not appear for all the frequencies studied: the frequency selective relationship between PTCs and OAEs mainly involved the 2 kHz zone. Such results are discussed according to the specificities of the clinical method used for PTC measurement as well as to the spectral characteristics of OAEs.

[1]  P Bray,et al.  An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[2]  J. P. Wilson,et al.  Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus , 1980, Hearing Research.

[3]  Geisler Cd,et al.  A cochlear model using feedback from motile outer hair cells , 1991 .

[4]  S. M. Khanna,et al.  Relationship between basilar membrane tuning and hair cell condition , 1986, Hearing Research.

[5]  W. Brownell.  Microscopic observation of cochlear hair cell motility. , 1984, Scanning electron microscopy.

[6]  W. L. C. Rutten,et al.  Evoked acoustic emissions from within normal and abnormal human ears: Comparison with audiometric and electrocochleographic findings , 1980, Hearing Research.

[7]  P. Avan,et al.  Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1991, Hearing Research.

[8]  L. Collet,et al.  Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. , 1991, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[9]  Miriam Furst,et al.  A cochlear model for acoustic emissions , 1987 .

[10]  S M Khanna,et al.  Histological evaluation of damage in cat cochleas used for measurement of basilar membrane mechanics. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Eberhard Zwicker,et al.  A hardware cochlear nonlinear preprocessing model with active feedback. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  L. Collet,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions: correlates between spectrum analysis and audiogram. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[13]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave , 1986, Hearing Research.

[14]  C. Elberling,et al.  Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear. II. Normative data in young adults and influence of posture. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[15]  David T. Kemp,et al.  Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects , 1990, Hearing Research.

[16]  L. Collet,et al.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and sensori-neural hearing loss. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  H. P. Zenner,et al.  Reversible contraction of isolated mammalian cochlear hair cells , 1985, Hearing Research.

[18]  E. Schloth.  Relation between spectral composition of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and finestructure of threschold in quiet , 1983 .

[19]  D. Kemp.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  E Zwicker,et al.  "Otoacoustic" emissions in a nonlinear cochlear hardware model with feedback. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  E. Zwicker.  On a Psychoacoustical Equivalent of Tuning Curves , 1974 .

[22]  R. J. Ritsma,et al.  On The Mechanism of the Evoked Cochlear Mechanical Response , 1980 .

[23]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  An active process in cochlear mechanics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[24]  D. W. Smith,et al.  Effects of outer hair cell loss on the frequency selectivity of the patas monkey auditory system , 1987, Hearing Research.

[25]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves , 1984, Hearing Research.

[26]  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: Clinical interest , 1989, The Laryngoscope.

[27]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Psychophysical tuning curves: Restricting the listening band to the signal region , 1979 .

[28]  P. Dallos.  Cochlear frequency selectivity in the presence of hair cell damage , 1977 .