Material and energy loss due to human and machine error in commercial FDM printers

Abstract Additive manufacturing is thought to have environmental benefits. However, material waste and energy consumption could be larger than expected due to human or printer error. In general, fused deposition modeling (FDM) printers using ABS plastic have three stages for parts fabrication: the standby period, preheating process and the printing process. In practice, the quantity of support material is influenced by the part orientation and settings of the printing. Material waste and energy consumption for commercial FDM printers using ABS material in a heavily utilized open shop were analyzed. The failed prints were classified into 9 different categories and analyzed. The data indicated that about 34% of the plastic used in the open studio was wasted. Only considering the failed prints as the extra amount of material consumed under realistic conditions, the mass of material lost to failed builds was about 2.22 times what might be estimated in a controlled process study. For energy consumption, the standby period and preheating time vary for every job, which results in variability of energy consumption. The printing time is based on the geometry of parts being built, the part printing orientation and setting of that print. From collected data, the preheating energy consumption is 0.835 MJ/kg, the printing is 21.5 MJ/kg, and the standby is 9.5 MJ/kg. Moreover, suggestions to reduce the building cost for each failure type are given. A life cycle inventory (LCI) combining the material waste and energy consumption data of FDM reveals that actual energy consumption may be 50% more than under ideal conditions.

[1]  Robert L. Nagel,et al.  A Review of University Maker Spaces , 2015 .

[2]  Liang Hou,et al.  Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review , 2013 .

[3]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  A designer's guide for dimensioning and tolerancing SLS parts , 2012 .

[4]  S. Faiz Ahmed,et al.  Feature Extraction and Optimum Part Deposition Orientation for FDM , 2015 .

[5]  C. Seepersad,et al.  A comparison of the energy efficiency of selective laser sintering and injection molding of nylon parts , 2012 .

[6]  Seth Allen,et al.  Part orientation and build cost determination in layered manufacturing , 1998, Comput. Aided Des..

[7]  Ian A. Ashcroft,et al.  ENERGY INPUTS TO ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING: DOES CAPACITY UTILIZATION MATTER? , 2011 .

[8]  Godfrey C. Onwubolu,et al.  Characterization and Optimization of Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Manufactured by the Fused Deposition Modelling Process , 2014 .

[9]  Sujit Das,et al.  Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: the case of lightweight aircraft components , 2016 .

[10]  Chris Keen,et al.  Airborne emissions of carcinogens and respiratory sensitizers during thermal processing of plastics. , 2013, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  Jack Howarth,et al.  A design of experiments approach for the optimisation of energy and waste during the production of parts manufactured by 3D printing , 2016 .

[12]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[13]  Sam Anand,et al.  Optimum Part Build Orientation in Additive Manufacturing for Minimizing Part Errors and Support Structures , 2015 .

[14]  Jeremy Faludi,et al.  Comparing Environmental Impacts of Additive Manufacturing vs. Traditional Machining via Life-Cycle Assessment , 2015 .

[15]  Anton J.M. Schoot Uiterkamp,et al.  A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies , 2014 .

[16]  Nicolas Perry,et al.  Rapid prototyping: energy and environment in the spotlight , 2006 .

[17]  Han Tong Loh,et al.  Considerations and selection of optimal orientation for different rapid prototyping systems , 1999 .

[18]  Chungsik Yoon,et al.  Emissions of Nanoparticles and Gaseous Material from 3D Printer Operation. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  A. K. Nagpal,et al.  Optimum Part Deposition Orientation in Stereolithography , 2005 .

[20]  Steven R Schmid Kalpakjian,et al.  Manufacturing Engineering and Technology , 1991 .

[21]  Karen A. Thole,et al.  Build Direction Effects on Microchannel Tolerance and Surface Roughness , 2015 .

[22]  Keiichi Sato,et al.  Affordances in Product Architecture: Linking Technical Functions and Users’ Tasks , 2005 .

[23]  Omar Ahmed Mohamed,et al.  Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects , 2015, Advances in Manufacturing.

[24]  Simon Ford,et al.  Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges , 2016 .

[25]  Ian A. Ashcroft,et al.  Transparency Built‐in , 2013 .

[26]  Karl R. Haapala,et al.  Environmental Performance Evaluation of a Fast Mask Image Projection Stereolithography Process through Time and Energy Modeling , 2016 .

[27]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Analysis of Distributed Three-Dimensional Printing and Conventional Manufacturing of Polymer Products , 2013 .