On The Impact of Different Number Representations in the Number Bisection Task

The number bisection task--in which the numerical middle of two other numbers has to be determined (e.g., 6 is the numerical middle of 4 and 8)--has recently been used in neuropsychological case studies in addition to the number comparison task to assess quantitative capabilities in number processing. While factors determining difficulty in normal participants have often been systematically investigated in the number comparison task, this has not yet been done in the number bisection task. Based on a pilot study by van Herten (1999), we extracted four factors that we hypothesized to modulate difficulty in a verification version of the number bisection task in normal participants: Multiplicativity (whether or not the three numbers are part of a multiplication table), range (distance between the smallest and the largest number) for bisectable number triplets as well as distance of the middle number to the numerical middle, and bisection possibility for non-bisectable triplets. In the current study, we obtained large effects for all four factors on RT and accuracy data and some interesting interactions in normal participants. In a regression analysis, we additionally observed inhibitory effects of decade crossing and of ten inclusion (whether or not one of the three numbers was a decade number). We discuss the impact of these results for the use of the number bisection task as an assessment tool in neuropsychology. Finally, we examine the consequences of these results for models of number processing.

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language and calculation within the parietal lobe: a combined cognitive, anatomical and fMRI study , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  VARIETIES OF PURE ALEXIA: THE CASE OF FAILURE TO ACCESS GRAPHEMIC REPRESENTATIONS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[3]  D. Norman,et al.  A representational analysis of numeration systems , 1995, Cognition.

[4]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line , 1999, Cognition.

[5]  Mark A. Sherman,et al.  Adjectival Negation and the Comprehension of Multiply Negated Sentences. , 1976 .

[6]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Two mental calculation systems: A case study of severe acalculia with preserved approximation , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Jeffrey Bisanz,et al.  Multiple routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems. , 1996 .

[8]  Mark A. Sherman,et al.  Bound to be easier? The negative prefix and sentence comprehension , 1973 .

[9]  B. Butterworth,et al.  Toward a multiroute model of number processing: Impaired number transcoding with preserved calculation skills. , 1995 .

[10]  D. Berch,et al.  Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Cognitive processes in verbal-number production: inferences from the performance of brain-damaged subjects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  S Dehaene,et al.  The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral Pathways for Calculation: Double Dissociation between Rote Verbal and Quantitative Knowledge of Arithmetic , 1997, Cortex.

[14]  Paul Macaruso,et al.  Representing and using numerical information. , 1995, The American psychologist.

[15]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[16]  W. Fias.  The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect , 1996 .

[17]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words , 1992, Cognition.

[18]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Facts, rules and procedures in normal calculation: Evidence from multiple single-patient studies of impaired arithmetic fact retrieval , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  T. Hines,et al.  An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgments about odd digits , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[20]  S Dehaene,et al.  CALCULATING WITHOUT READING: UNSUSPECTED RESIDUAL ABILITIES IN PURE ALEXIA , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[21]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Initial phoneme versus whole-word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. , 1998 .

[22]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Neglect dyslexia for numbers? a case report , 1991 .

[23]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Parallel processing and initial phoneme criterion in naming words : Evidence from frequency effects on onset and rime duration , 1999 .

[25]  M. McCloskey.  Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia , 1992, Cognition.

[26]  W Fias,et al.  Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect , 2001, Psychological research.

[27]  M. Brysbaert.  Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. , 1995 .

[28]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  S. Dehaene.  Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[30]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins , 2001, Cognition.