CRASHWORTHINESS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN USING RIGID-FLEXIBLE MULTIBODY DYNAMICS WITH APPLICATION TO TRAIN VEHICLES

SUMMARY Di⁄erent formulations based on multibody dynamics are shown to be suitable for the development of a methodology for the impact simulation and crashworthiness design of railway vehicles. The proposed design methodology comprises di⁄erent computer-aided tools of increasing complexity and accuracy which can be used with greater advantage and eƒciency in the di⁄erent design stages of railway stock. In general, the crashworthiness design methods and associated multibody dynamic tools which are presented in this paper require information to be obtained from numerical or experimental crush tests of specific structural components, subassemblies and critical energy absorption devices normally located in car extremities. This hybrid feature lends to the present design process various eƒciency gains as a result of a better understanding of the crash and di⁄erent collapse mechanisms and ease of use. To access the merits of the present methodologies some new designs are discussed and the application of the proposed numerical tools is illustrated for di⁄erent structural configurations of car extremities. A formulation for the sensitivity analysis and optimization of planar constrained mechanical systems is also presented. An example of crashworthiness design of an end underframe model of a railway car is solved to demonstrate the use of the methodology. The interest in railway transportation has significantly increased for economical and environmental reasons. In fact, with the advent of high-speed trains, the railway has become a very promising and attractive means of transportation for mass transit and commuter and longdistance travelling. There is now an increasing awareness of the costs of railway accidents, in terms of human su⁄ering in general and property damage. This situation has encouraged operators, manufacturers and research institutions to join e⁄orts in the development of new design capabilities taking into account impact conditions with the aim to significantly reduce damage costs and human injuries and fatalities. This involves an e⁄ort towards a better understanding of the mechanics of railway collisions including more accurate evaluation of impact loads which, in turn, allows the development of new crashworthy railway car extremities with reduced uncertainty margins and with maximal energy absorption characteristics. During the last twenty-five years, computer-aided analysis of crashworthiness and structural impact has received considerable attention and is now emerging as a powerful methodology

[1]  Joseph Edward Shigley,et al.  Mechanical engineering design , 1972 .

[2]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Variable Degree-of-Freedom Component Mode Analysis of Inertia Variant Flexible Mechanical Systems , 1983 .

[3]  H. Movahedi-Lankarani Canonical equations of motion and estimation of parameters in the analysis of impact problems. , 1988 .

[4]  J. Ambrósio,et al.  Elasto-plastic deformations in multibody dynamics , 1992 .

[5]  Parviz E. Nikravesh,et al.  Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems , 1988 .

[6]  P. Nikravesh Systematic reduction of multibody equations of motion to a minimal set , 1990 .

[7]  Y. Ohkubo,et al.  MEAN CRUSHING STRENGTH OF CLOSED-HAT SECTION MEMBERS , 1974 .

[8]  Paul Du Bois,et al.  Automotive Crashworthiness Performance on a Supercomputer , 1987 .

[9]  Ji Oh Song An optimization method for crashworthiness design , 1986 .

[10]  P. Nikravesh,et al.  Optimal Design of Mechanical Systems With Constraint Violation Stabilization Method , 1985 .

[11]  Kuang-Huei Lin A Rear-End Barrier Impact Simulation Model for Unibody Passenger Cars , 1973 .

[12]  A. G. Ulsoy,et al.  Dynamics of a Radially Rotating Beam With Impact, Part 2: Experimental and Simulation Results , 1989 .

[13]  Parviz E. Nikravesh,et al.  Rollover simulation and crashworthiness analysis of trucks , 1990 .

[14]  Richard I. Emori,et al.  Analytical Approach to Automobile Collisions , 1968 .

[15]  Parviz E. Nikravesh,et al.  Crashworthiness analysis of a truck , 1990 .

[16]  Dušan Kecman,et al.  Bending collapse of rectangular and square section tubes , 1983 .

[17]  Curtis J. Dressler,et al.  HIGH SPEED IMPACT AND AGGRESSIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE CALSPAN/CHRYSLER RESEARCH SAFETY VEHICLE (RSV) , 1979 .

[18]  D Kecman ANALYSIS OF FRAMEWORK-TYPE SAFETY STRUCTURES IN ROAD VEHICLES , 1983 .

[19]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Mathematica: a system for doing mathematics by computer (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[20]  L. Shampine,et al.  Computer solution of ordinary differential equations : the initial value problem , 1975 .

[21]  Richard A. Wilson,et al.  State-of-the-Art-A Review of Vehicle Impact Testing: How It Began and What is Being Done , 1970 .

[22]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[23]  Robert Winter,et al.  Theory and application of finite element analysis to structural crash simulation , 1981 .

[24]  R J Hayduk APPLICATION OF THE NON-LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT COMPUTER PROGRAM "DYCAST" TO AIRCRAFT CRASH ANALYSIS , 1983 .

[25]  G. Vanderplaats,et al.  Structural optimization by methods of feasible directions. , 1973 .

[26]  E Haug STATIC AND DYNAMIC FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL CRASHWORTHINESS IN THE AUTOMOTIVE AND AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES , 1983 .

[27]  M. S. Pereira,et al.  Dynamic analysis of spatial flexible multibody systems using joint co‐ordinates , 1991 .

[28]  J. Baumgarte Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems , 1972 .

[29]  G. N. Vanderplaats,et al.  ADS: A FORTRAN program for automated design synthesis: Version 1.10 , 1984 .

[30]  M. M. Kamal,et al.  Analysis and Simulation of Vehicle to Barrier Impact , 1970 .

[31]  R. Lust,et al.  Structural optimization with crashworthiness constraints , 1992 .