Clinical results of percutaneous pelvic surgery. Computer assisted surgery using ultrasound compared to standard fluoroscopy.

This study presents early results of clinical experience with the application of Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) to percutaneous iliosacral screwing, with comparison to a historical series of patients treated using percutaneous fluoroscopy. Four patients were instrumented using a CAS system, with 10 screws being inserted. Thirty patients were treated by percutaneous fluoroscopic screwing, with 51 screws being inserted. The follow-up assessment included the following criteria; operative time, parameters of radiation exposure, neurological examination, screw placement evaluation on CT-scan, antalgic drug consumption, pain, Majeed grading, and loosening of implants. In the CAS group, the average radiation time was 0.35 min per patient and 0.14 min per screw. No trajectories outside the bone and no postoperative neurological deficits were found. In the fluoroscopic group, the average radiation time was 1.03 min per patient and 0.6 min per screw. Twelve screws had outside-bone trajectories, and iatrogenic neurological deficits were found in seven patients. The average operative time was 50 min in the CAS group and 35 min in the fluoroscopic group. The present CAS technique shows better placement of iliosacral screws, with no outside-bone trajectories and lower radiation exposure.

[1]  F. Mann,et al.  Radiographic recognition of the sacral alar slope for optimal placement of iliosacral screws: a cadaveric and clinical study. , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[2]  S A Majeed,et al.  Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  A. Jones,et al.  Percutaneous fixation of the columns of the acetabulum: a new technique. , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[4]  C. Barbe,et al.  Using 2.5D echography in computer assisted spine surgery , 1993, Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Societ.

[5]  D. Templeman,et al.  Proximity of iliosacral screws to neurovascular structures after internal fixation. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  W. Mills,et al.  Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[7]  A. Peitzman,et al.  Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation: early treatment for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  N. Ebraheim,et al.  Percutaneous computed-tomography-stabilization of pelvic fractures: preliminary report. , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[9]  Richard M. Harrington,et al.  Internal Fixation for the Transforaminal Sacral Fracture , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Lutz-Peter Nolte,et al.  Virtual Fluoroscopy: Safe Zones for Pelvic Screw Fixations , 2000, MICCAI.

[11]  J. Matta,et al.  Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Philip J. Kregor,et al.  Early Results of Percutaneous Iliosacral Screws Placed with the Patient in the Supine Position , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[13]  P. Engelhardt,et al.  [Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation of vertical unstable pelvic ring fractures]. , 1996, Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera.

[14]  D. Laverty,et al.  Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum , 2004 .

[15]  Lionel Carrat,et al.  Percutaneous Iliosacral Screw Placement Using Image Guided Techniques , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  M. Routt,et al.  Author's Reply: Regarding Safe and Effective Placement of Ileosacral Screws , 1996 .