Heterogeneous aggregators competing in a local flexibility market for active distribution system management: A bi-level programming approach

Abstract The emerging role of aggregators in the electric power industry brings forth financial benefits and opportunities for the efficient management of active distribution systems (ADS). Aggregators represent heterogeneous sources of flexibility connected at demand-side, such as flexible loads, small-scale renewable energy sources (RES) and energy storage systems (ESS), and regulate their consumption and/or production in a manner to offer competitive flexibility services. This paper introduces a novel one-leader multi-followers bi-level programming model for the procurement of flexibility services in a local market that is organized for the management of ADS. The upper level problem maximizes the profit of a distribution company, which acts as supplier of electricity to end-customers, while considering the network technical constraints that are imposed by the distribution system operator. The lower level problems, in turn, maximize the profit of multiple heterogeneous aggregators acting as flexibility service providers. Two different types of aggregators have been modeled: a) load aggregators, each interacting with a group of flexible end-customers (residential or commercial), and b) RES-ESS aggregators, each managing a group of small-scale RES by exploiting ESS. The model is tested on a modified 33-nodes distribution system to demonstrate the financial benefits that arise, and fruitful findings are extracted with sensitivity analysis.

[1]  Josep M. Guerrero,et al.  A stochastic bi‐level decision‐making framework for a load‐serving entity in day‐ahead and balancing markets , 2019, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems.

[2]  Joao P. S. Catalao,et al.  A Risk-Based Decision Framework for the Distribution Company in Mutual Interaction With the Wholesale Day-Ahead Market and Microgrids , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[3]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Hierarchical Decision Making for Aggregated Energy Management of Distributed Resources , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Iason I. Avramidis,et al.  Flexibility Services Management Under Uncertainties for Power Distribution Systems: Stochastic Scheduling and Predictive Real-Time Dispatch , 2020, IEEE Access.

[5]  Long Bao Le,et al.  Dynamic Pricing Design for Demand Response Integration in Power Distribution Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Wenchuan Wu,et al.  Bi-Level Programming for Optimal Operation of an Active Distribution Network With Multiple Virtual Power Plants , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[7]  Ivana Kockar,et al.  Dynamic Optimal Power Flow for Active Distribution Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Nataliya I. Kalashnykova,et al.  Bilevel Programming Problems , 2015 .

[9]  Mahmoud-Reza Haghifam,et al.  Modelling hierarchical decision making framework for operation of active distribution grids , 2015 .

[10]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Demand side flexibility schemes for facilitating the high penetration of residential distributed energy resources , 2018 .

[11]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Real-Time Trading Strategies of Proactive DISCO With Heterogeneous DG Owners , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Coordinated Energy Management of Networked Microgrids in Distribution Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  Junyong Liu,et al.  Bi-level Demand Response Scheme in the Presence of Aggregators with Thermally Responsive Loads , 2019, 2019 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Asia (ISGT Asia).

[14]  J. Riquelme-Santos,et al.  A simpler and exact mathematical model for the computation of the minimal power losses tree , 2010 .

[15]  Felix F. Wu,et al.  Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing , 1989 .

[16]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Real-Time Procurement Strategies of a Proactive Distribution Company With Aggregator-Based Demand Response , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[17]  Henrik W. Bindner,et al.  A local flexibility market mechanism with capacity limitation services , 2021 .

[18]  Gerard Ledwich,et al.  Aggregator of Demand Response for Renewable Integration and Customer Engagement: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats , 2018, Energies.

[19]  Kenneth Bruninx,et al.  On the Interaction Between Aggregators, Electricity Markets and Residential Demand Response Providers , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Joao P. S. Catalao,et al.  Comprehensive review on the decision-making frameworks referring to the distribution network operation problem in the presence of distributed energy resources and microgrids , 2020 .

[21]  Heinrich von Stackelberg Market Structure and Equilibrium , 2010 .

[22]  Joao P. S. Catalao,et al.  Bi-level optimization model for the coordination between transmission and distribution systems interacting with local energy markets , 2021, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[23]  Andreas Sumper,et al.  Local Flexibility Market Design for Aggregators Providing Multiple Flexibility Services at Distribution Network Level , 2018 .

[24]  M. Parsa Moghaddam,et al.  A bi-level optimization model for operation of distribution networks with micro-grids , 2016 .

[25]  Michael Liu,et al.  Paving the Way for Advanced Distribution Management Systems Applications: Making the Most of Models and Data , 2020, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[26]  Xiaolong Jin,et al.  Local flexibility markets: Literature review on concepts, models and clearing methods , 2020, Applied Energy.