Motivational Interviewing with Problem Drinkers

Motivational interviewing is an approach based upon principles of experimental social psychology, applying processes such as attribution, cognitive dissonance, and self-efficacy. Motivation is conceptualized not as a personality trait but as an interpersonal process. The model deemphasizes labeling and places heavy emphasis on individual responsibility and internal attribution of change. Cognitive dissonance is created by contrasting the ongoing problem behavior with salient awareness of the behavior's negative consequences. Empathic processes from the methods of Carl Rogers, social psychological principles of motivation, and objective assessment feedback are employed to channel this dissonance toward a behavior change solution, avoiding the “short circuits” of low self-esteem, low self-efficacy, and denial. This motivational process is understood within a larger developmental model of change in which contemplation and determination are important early steps which can be influenced by therapist interventions. A schematic diagram of the motivational process and a six-step sequence for implementing motivational interviewing are suggested.

[1]  W. Miller,et al.  Focused versus broad-spectrum behavior therapy for problem drinkers. , 1980, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  W. Miller,et al.  Two-year follow-up of bibliotherapy and therapist-directed controlled drinking training for problem drinkers , 1983 .

[3]  R W Ohlson,et al.  Parent effectiveness training. , 1972, Alaska medicine.

[4]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. , 1982 .

[5]  R. Munoz,et al.  How to Control Your Drinking , 1982 .

[6]  W. Miller,et al.  Estimating blood alcohol concentration: two computer programs and their applications in therapy and research. , 1979, Addictive behaviors.

[7]  L. Sobell,et al.  Validity of self-reports of alcohol-related arrests by alcoholics. , 1974, Quarterly journal of studies on alcohol.

[8]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[9]  David J. Armor,et al.  The course of alcoholism : four years after treatment , 1980 .

[10]  W. Miller,et al.  Significant others as corroborative sources for problem drinkers. , 1979, Addictive behaviors.

[11]  H. Arkowitz,et al.  The role of attribution and self-perception in behavior change: implications for behavior therapy. , 1975, Genetic psychology monographs.

[12]  W. Miller Alcoholism scales and objective assessment methods: a review. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  W. Miller Behavioral treatment of problem drinkers: a comparative outcome study of three controlled drinking therapies. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[15]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  W. Miller The addictive behaviors : treatment of alcoholism, drug abuse, smoking, and obesity , 1980 .

[17]  W. Miller,et al.  Prediction of abstinence, controlled drinking, and heavy drinking outcomes following behavioral self-control training. , 1979, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  R. Hodgson,et al.  Alcohol dependence and the priming effect. , 1979, Behaviour research and therapy.