Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.

The potential of the computer program PASS (Prediction Activity Spectra for Substances) to predict rodent carcinogenicity for chemical compounds was studied. PASS predicts carcinogenicity of chemical compounds on the basis of their structural formula and of structure-activity relationship analysis of known carcinogens and non-carcinogens. The data on structures and experimental results of 2-year carcinogenicity assays for 412 chemicals from the NTP (National Toxicological Program) and 1190 chemicals from the CPDB (Carcinogenic Potency Database) were used in our study. The predictions take into consideration information about species and sex of animals. For evaluation of the predictive accuracy we used two procedures: leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO CV) and leave-20%-out cross-validation. In the last case we randomly divided the studied data set 20 times into two subsets. The data from the first subset, containing 80% of the compounds, were added to the PASS training set (which includes about 46,000 compounds with about 1500 biological activity types collected during the last 20 years to predict biological activity spectra), the second subset with 20% of the compounds was used as an evaluation set. The mean accuracy of prediction calculated by LOO CV is about 73% for NTP compounds in the 'equivocal' category of carcinogenic activity and 80% for NTP compounds in the 'evidence' category of carcinogenicity. The mean accuracy of prediction for the CPDB database is 89.9% calculated by LOO CV and 63.4% calculated by leave-20%-out cross-validation. Influence of incorporation of species and sex data on the accuracy of carcinogenicity prediction was also investigated. It was shown that the accuracy was increased only for data on male animals.

[1]  V. Poroikov,et al.  Prediction of biological activity spectra for substances: evaluation on the diverse sets of drug-like structures. , 2003, Current medicinal chemistry.

[2]  H. Rosenkranz,et al.  Prediction of the carcinogenicity of a second group of organic chemicals undergoing carcinogenicity testing. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  H. Rosenkranz,et al.  Estimation of the optimal data base size for structure-activity analyses: the Salmonella mutagenicity data base. , 1996, Mutation research.

[4]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  An approach for evaluating and increasing the informational content of mutagenicity and clastogenicity data bases. , 1993, Mutagenesis.

[5]  Romualdo Benigni,et al.  The second National Toxicology Program comparative exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: definitive results. , 2004, Mutation research.

[6]  Vladimir Poroikov,et al.  How to acquire new biological activities in old compounds by computer prediction , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[7]  C. Ioannides,et al.  COMPACT and molecular structure in toxicity assessment: a prospective evaluation of 30 chemicals currently being tested for rodent carcinogenicity by the NCI/NTP. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  R. Isfort,et al.  Use of the Syrian hamster embryo cell transformation assay for carcinogenicity prediction of chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program in rodent bioassays. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  C A Marchant,et al.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity using the DEREK system for 30 chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program. The DEREK Collaborative Group. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  Vladimir Poroikov,et al.  Robustness of Biological Activity Spectra Predicting by Computer Program PASS for Noncongeneric Sets of Chemical Compounds , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[11]  L. Gold,et al.  Supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB): results of animal bioassays published in the general literature in 1993 to 1994 and by the National Toxicology Program in 1995 to 1996. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  J. Contrera,et al.  A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software. , 1998, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  Vladimir Poroikov,et al.  Pass: Prediction of Biological Activity Spectra for Substances , 2005 .

[14]  A.M. Richard,et al.  AI and SAR approaches for predicting chemical carcinogenicity: Survey and status report , 2002, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[15]  R. Tennant,et al.  Stratification of rodent carcinogenicity bioassay results to reflect relative human hazard. , 1993, Mutation research.

[16]  B. Ames,et al.  Extrapolation of carcinogenicity between species: qualitative and quantitative factors. , 1992, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  J. Huff,et al.  The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazards. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[18]  Jerrold M. Ward,et al.  Review Article: Compendium of Chemical Carcinogens by Target Organ: Results of Chronic Bioassays in Rats, Mice, Hamsters, Dogs, and Monkeys , 2001, Toxicologic pathology.

[19]  R. King,et al.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  Yin-tak Woo,et al.  Mechanism‐based structure‐activity relationship (SAR) analysis of carcinogenic potential of 30 NTP test chemicals∗ , 1997 .