Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Skull Base Surgery: A Review of 71 Consecutive Cases.

BACKGROUND Although intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) increasingly is used during glioma resection, its role in skull base surgery has not been well documented. In this study, we evaluate our experience with iMRI for skull base surgery. METHODS Medical records were reviewed retrospectively on all neurosurgical cases performed at our institution in the IMRIS iMRI suite between April 2014 and July 2015. RESULTS During the study period, the iMRI suite was used for 71 skull base tumors. iMRI was performed in 23 of 71 cases. Additional tumor resection was pursued after scanning in 7 of 23 patients. There was a significant difference in procedure length between the scanned versus nonscanned groups, and this was likely attributable to a greater proportion of petroclival meningiomas in the scanned group. Further analyses revealed significant increases in procedure length for the following scanned subgroups: anterolateral approach, anterolateral and petroclival lesion locations, and meningiomas. The rate of non-neurologic complications was significantly greater in the scanned group, particularly for patients with tumors >3 cm. CONCLUSIONS Despite the unique challenges associated with skull base tumor surgery, iMRI can be safely obtained while adding a modest although not prohibitive amount of time to the procedure. The immediate evidence of residual tumor with a patient still in position to have additional resection may influence the surgeon to alter the surgical plan and attempt further resection in a critical area.

[1]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[2]  G. Sutherland,et al.  Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Skull Base Surgery , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  T. Gasser,et al.  INTRAOPERATIVE NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING IN AN OPEN LOW‐FIELD MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SYSTEM: CLINICAL EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[4]  J. Fandino,et al.  The role of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in complex meningioma surgery. , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  W. Harkness,et al.  Postimaging brain distortion: magnitude, correlates, and impact on neuronavigation. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  D. Simpson THE RECURRENCE OF INTRACRANIAL MENINGIOMAS AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT , 1957, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  C. Snyderman,et al.  Nasopharyngeal angiofibromas: Selecting a surgical approach , 1997, Head & neck.

[8]  A. Parsa,et al.  Skull base chondrosarcoma: evidence-based treatment paradigms. , 2013, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[9]  H. El-Kashlan,et al.  Recurrence of acoustic neuroma after incomplete resection. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[10]  Volker Seifert,et al.  FEASIBILITY OF POLESTAR N20, AN ULTRA‐LOW‐FIELD INTRAOPERATIVE MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SYSTEM IN RESECTION CONTROL OF PITUITARY MACROADENOMAS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FIRST 40 CASES , 2008, Neurosurgery.