Improving mass detection by adaptive and multiscale processing in digitized mammograms

A new CAD mass detection system was developed using adaptive and multi-scale processing methods for improving detection sensitivity/specificity, and its robustness to the variation in mammograms. The major techniques developed in system design include: (1) image standardization by applying a series of preprocessing to remove extrinsic signal, extract breast area, and normalize the image intensity; (2) multi- mode processing by decomposing image features using directional wavelet transform and non-linear multi-scale representation using anisotropic diffusion; (3) adaptive processing in image segmentation using localized adaptive thresholding and adaptive clustering; and (4) combined `hard'-`soft' classification by using a modified fuzzy decision tree and committee decision-making method. Evaluations and comparisons were taken with a training dataset containing 30 normal and 47 abnormal mammograms with totally 70 masses, and an independent testing dataset consisting of 100 normal images, 39 images with 48 minimal cancers and 25 images with 25 benign masses. A high detection performance of sensitivity TP equals 93% with false positive rate FP equals 3.1 per image and a good generalizability with TP equals 80% and FP equals 2.0 per image are obtained.

[1]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  C. M. Hill Computer-aided diagnosis. , 1992, Dental update.

[3]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  L P Clarke,et al.  Digital mammography: computer-assisted diagnosis method for mass detection with multiorientation and multiresolution wavelet transforms. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[6]  R. Wahl,et al.  New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  M. Wallis,et al.  A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. , 1991, Clinical radiology.

[8]  Lihua Li,et al.  Wavelet transform for directional feature extraction in medical imaging , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[9]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[10]  G. Thompson,et al.  The Theory of Committees and Elections. , 1959 .

[11]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision , 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  Nuggehally Sampath Jayant,et al.  An adaptive clustering algorithm for image segmentation , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[13]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  D B Kopans Efficacy of screening mammography for women in their forties. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.