Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches

Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long versus short question format, and evaluative dimension. Study data are drawn from a multiphase program of research on crowding on the carriage roads of Acadia National Park, Maine. Differences in crowding norms developed from alternative measurement approaches are described and discussed. Study findings suggest that commonly used norm-measurement approaches may lead to crowding-related standards of quality that are overly conservative.

[1]  R. Manning,et al.  Indicators and Standards of Quality for Ski Resort Management , 1998 .

[2]  Michael Rees,et al.  Getting a handle on visitor carrying capacity - A pilot project at Arches National Park , 1994 .

[3]  R. Manning Crowding norms in backcountry settings: a review and synthesis. , 1985 .

[4]  Thomas A. Heberlein,et al.  Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings , 1986 .

[5]  Bo Shelby,et al.  Establishing management standards: Selected examples of the normative approach , 1993 .

[6]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  The variability of user-based social impact standards for wilderness management. , 1992 .

[7]  Bo Shelby,et al.  Crowding Models for Backcountry Recreation , 1980 .

[8]  B. Shelby,et al.  Effect of varied question format on boaters’ norms , 1996 .

[9]  J. Vaske,et al.  Backcountry encounter norms: theory, method and empirical evidence. , 1986 .

[10]  David N. Cole,et al.  The Limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning , 1985 .

[11]  B. Shelby,et al.  Product shift in recreation settings: Findings and implications from panel research , 1995 .

[12]  B. Shelby Encounter norms in backcountry settings: studies of three rivers. , 1981 .

[13]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  The effect of norm-encounter compatibility on crowding perceptions, experience and behavior in river recreation settings. , 1991 .

[14]  David Pitt,et al.  Crowding norms at frontcountry sites: A visual approach to setting standards of quality , 1996 .

[15]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  Defining acceptable conditions in wilderness , 1993 .

[16]  J. Heywood Behavioral Conventions in Higher Density, Day Use Wildland/Urban Recreation Settings: A Preliminary Case Study , 1993 .

[17]  Bo Shelby,et al.  User standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. , 1988 .

[18]  B. Shelby,et al.  Encounter measures in carrying capacity research: actual, reported, and diary contacts. , 1982 .

[19]  Norm congruence among tour boat passengers to Glacier Bay national park , 1996 .

[20]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  River Float Trip Encounter Norms: Questioning the Use of the Social Norms Concept , 1991 .

[21]  S. Mccool,et al.  Wilderness campsite impacts: Do managers and visitors see them the same? , 1989 .

[22]  M. E. Patterson,et al.  Coping behavior to avoid visitor encounters: its relationship to wildland privacy. , 1991 .

[23]  Game theory: A basis for analyzing emerging norms and conventions in outdoor recreation , 1993 .

[24]  Bo Shelby,et al.  Displacement and Product Shift: Empirical Evidence from Oregon Rivers , 1988 .

[25]  J. Heywood Social regularities in outdoor recreation , 1996 .

[26]  Robert E. Manning,et al.  Computer Simulation Modeling for Recreation Management: A Study on Carriage Road Use in Acadia National Park, Maine, USA , 1999, Environmental management.

[27]  W. Hammitt,et al.  Use encounter standards and curves for achieved privacy in wilderness , 1995 .

[28]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Using a social carrying capacity model to estimate the effects of marina development at the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore , 1986 .

[29]  M. Tarrant,et al.  Measuring perceived crowding for high‐density river recreation: The effects of situational conditions and personal factors , 1997 .

[30]  Bo Shelby,et al.  Using normative data to develop evaluative standards for resource management: a comment on three recent papers. , 1991 .

[31]  Bo Shelby,et al.  Comparing methods for determining visitor evaluations of ecological impacts: site visits, photographs, and written descriptions , 1985 .

[32]  J. Vaske,et al.  Norms, standards, and natural resources , 1996 .

[33]  Robert E. Manning,et al.  Studies in outdoor recreation , 1986 .

[34]  F. Noe Further Questions about the Measurement and Conceptualization of Backcountry Encounter Norms , 1992 .

[35]  M. E. Patterson,et al.  Backcountry encounter norms, actual reported encounters, and their relationship to wilderness solitude. , 1990 .

[36]  Dorothy H. Anderson,et al.  Paddle canoeists’ encounter norms in Minnesota's boundary waters canoe area wilderness , 1996 .

[37]  J. Vaske,et al.  Country of origin, encounter norms, and crowding in a frontcountry setting , 1996 .