AutoQS v1: automatic parametrization of QuickSampling based on training images analysis

Abstract. Multiple-point geostatistics are widely used to simulate complex spatial structures based on a training image. The practical applicability of these methods relies on the possibility of finding optimal training images and parametrization of the simulation algorithms. While methods for automatically selecting training images are available, parametrization can be cumbersome. Here, we propose to find an optimal set of parameters using only the training image as input. The difference between this and previous work that used parametrization optimization is that it does not require the definition of an objective function. Our approach is based on the analysis of the errors that occur when filling artificially constructed patterns that have been borrowed from the training image. Its main advantage is to eliminate the risk of overfitting an objective function, which may result in variance underestimation or in verbatim copy of the training image. Since it is not based on optimization, our approach finds a set of acceptable parameters in a predictable manner by using the knowledge and understanding of how the simulation algorithms work. The technique is explored in the context of the recently developed QuickSampling algorithm, but it can be easily adapted to other pixel-based multiple-point statistics algorithms using pattern matching, such as direct sampling or single normal equation simulation (SNESIM).

[1]  Gregoire Mariethoz,et al.  QuickSampling v1.0: a robust and simplified pixel-based multiple-point simulation approach , 2020, Geoscientific Model Development.

[2]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  MPS-APO: a rapid and automatic parameter optimizer for multiple-point geostatistics , 2019, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[3]  Mohammad J. Abdollahifard,et al.  Efficient training image selection for multiple-point geostatistics via analysis of contours , 2019, Comput. Geosci..

[4]  P. Renard,et al.  Automatic parameter tuning of multiple-point statistical simulations for lateritic bauxite deposits , 2018 .

[5]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  Multiple-point Geostatistics: Stochastic Modeling with Training Images , 2014 .

[6]  Julián M. Ortiz,et al.  Verifying the high-order consistency of training images with data for multiple-point geostatistics , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[7]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  Simulation of Earth textures by conditional image quilting , 2014 .

[8]  J. Caers,et al.  Comparing Training-Image Based Algorithms Using an Analysis of Distance , 2014, Mathematical Geosciences.

[9]  Omid Asghari,et al.  Multiple-point geostatistical simulation using the bunch-pasting direct sampling method , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[10]  Philippe Renard,et al.  A practical guide to performing multiple-point statistical simulations with the Direct Sampling algorithm , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[11]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  An Improved Parallel Multiple-point Algorithm Using a List Approach , 2011 .

[12]  Gregoire Mariethoz,et al.  The Direct Sampling method to perform multiple‐point geostatistical simulations , 2010 .

[13]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Multiple Point Metrics to Assess Categorical Variable Models , 2010 .

[14]  A. Journel,et al.  The Necessity of a Multiple-Point Prior Model , 2007 .

[15]  J. Gómez-Hernández,et al.  To be or not to be multi-Gaussian? A reflection on stochastic hydrogeology , 1998 .

[16]  G. Matheron The intrinsic random functions and their applications , 1973, Advances in Applied Probability.

[17]  Philippe Renard,et al.  Connectivity metrics for subsurface flow and transport , 2013 .

[18]  Sebastien Strebelle,et al.  Conditional Simulation of Complex Geological Structures Using Multiple-Point Statistics , 2002 .

[19]  R. M. Srivastava,et al.  Multivariate Geostatistics: Beyond Bivariate Moments , 1993 .