Longitudinal driving behavior under adverse weather conditions: adaptation effects, model performance and freeway capacity in case of fog

Adverse weather conditions have been shown to have a substantial impact on traffic flow operations. It is however unclear which adaptation effects in actual longitudinal driving behavior underlie this impact, how these adaptation effects relate to freeway capacity as well as to what extent current mathematical models of car-following behavior are adequate in incorporating these adaptation effects. In this regard a driving simulator experiment with a repeated measures design was performed in order to examine the influence of fog on adaptation effects, freeway capacity and parameter value changes and model performance of the Helly model and Intelligent Driver Model. From the results followed that fog led to a decrease in speed as well as in acceleration. Furthermore a substantial increase in distance to the lead vehicle was observed. These effects were implemented and simulated in a traffic simulation model. A substantial reduction in freeway capacity was found. This stresses the need to possess models of driving behavior, which are adequate in describing and predicting these adaptation effects. From the estimation results of the Helly model and IDM using a calibration approach for joint estimation followed that sensitivity factors, maximum acceleration and deceleration decreased substantially after the start of the adverse weather condition. Parameters representing headway increased significantly. Furthermore it followed from the results that the estimated models decreased in performance after the start of the adverse weather conditions

[1]  Fabrice Vienne,et al.  Can Headway Reduction in Fog Be Explained by Impaired Perception of Relative Motion? , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Hazard perception and driving experience among novice drivers. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Thomas H Maze,et al.  Weather and Its Impact on Urban Freeway Traffic Operations , 2006 .

[4]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[5]  Shih-Miao Chin,et al.  Temporary Losses of Highway Capacity and Impacts on Performance , 2002 .

[6]  E. R. Jones,et al.  THE ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCE OF RAIN ON FREEWAY CAPACITY , 1970 .

[7]  B. Reimer,et al.  Using self-reported data to assess the validity of driving simulation data , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[8]  E. Boer Car following from the driver’s perspective , 1999 .

[9]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[10]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Car-following: a historical review , 1999 .

[11]  R Sumner,et al.  DRIVING IN FOG ON THE M4 , 1977 .

[12]  B Bulte BROUILLARD. STATION DE MESURE A1 PR: 169,5 : COMPORTEMENT PAR VISIBILITE REDUITE , 1985 .

[13]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[14]  Werner Brilon,et al.  Reliability of Freeway Traffic Flow: A Stochastic Concept of Capacity , 2005 .

[15]  R. Snowden,et al.  Speed perception fogs up as visibility drops , 1998, Nature.

[16]  M. Kuwahara,et al.  Does Weather Affect Highway Capacity , 2006 .

[17]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Generic Calibration Framework for Joint Estimation of Car-Following Models by Using Microscopic Data , 2010 .

[18]  Chris M.J. Tampère,et al.  Human-kinetic multiclass traffic flow theory and modelling. With application to Advanced Driver Assistance Systems in congestion , 2004 .

[19]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Don Scott,et al.  Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  D J Jeffery,et al.  SOME ASPECTS OF MOTORWAY TRAFFIC BEHAVIOUR IN FOG , 1980 .