Content validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21

ABSTRACT Objective: to cross-culturally adapt and assess the content validity evidence of the Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21 for the Brazilian context. Method: a psychometric study of cross-cultural adaptation, covering the stages of translation, reconciliation, back-translation, intercultural equivalence assessment and content validity evidence analysis, considering Content Validity Ratio parameters in breast cancer survivors. Results: the translations were equivalent to the original version. Colloquial expressions were modified, tense, verbal adjusted, and two items containing multiple commands were separated. The final version now contains 22 items, presenting semantic, conceptual, idiomatic and experimental equivalences. The pre-test indicated good understanding and ease in the response process. Conclusion: the final version was defined as “Lista de verificação de sintomas cognitivos relacionados ao trabalho - 22 itens”, showing good linguistic equivalence and strong evidence of content validity in the Brazilian context.

[1]  A. Whittaker,et al.  Prevalence of cognitive impairment following chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[2]  D. Cella,et al.  Association of cognitive impairment and breast cancer survivorship on quality of life in younger breast cancer survivors , 2021, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[3]  Y. Roquelaure,et al.  Return to work of breast cancer survivors: toward an integrative and transactional conceptual model , 2021, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[4]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  N. Ernstmann,et al.  Occupational rehabilitation of male breast cancer patients: Return patterns, motives, experiences, and implications-A qualitative study. , 2021, European journal of cancer care.

[6]  T. Tanigawa,et al.  Predictors of resignation and sick leave after cancer diagnosis among Japanese breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study , 2020, BMC Public Health.

[7]  Marceli de Oliveira Santos,et al.  Estimativa/2020 – Incidência de Câncer no Brasil , 2020 .

[8]  C. Paiva,et al.  Factors associated with return to work in breast cancer survivors treated at the Public Cancer Hospital in Brazil , 2020, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[9]  M. Jefford,et al.  Building a novel occupational rehabilitation program to support cancer survivors to return to health, wellness, and work in Australia , 2019, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[10]  X. Bonfill,et al.  Socio-economic impact on women diagnosed and treated for breast cancer: a cross-sectional study , 2019, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[11]  J. Wiskemann,et al.  Return to work after breast cancer: The role of treatment-related side effects and potential impact on quality of life. , 2019, European journal of cancer care.

[12]  F. Sperandio,et al.  Qualitative study of return to work following breast cancer treatment. , 2019, Occupational medicine.

[13]  S. Costi,et al.  Factors influencing return to work of cancer survivors: a population-based study in Italy , 2019, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[14]  H. Brenner,et al.  Return to work after cancer. A multi-regional population-based study from Germany , 2019, Acta oncologica.

[15]  R. Bonfiglioli,et al.  Perceived work ability at return to work in women treated for breast cancer: a questionnaire-based study , 2018, La Medicina del lavoro.

[16]  Raylane da Silva Machado,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation methods of instruments in the nursing area. , 2018, Revista gaucha de enfermagem.

[17]  Luis M. Lozano,et al.  Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice , 2018, Psicothema.

[18]  V. Savalei,et al.  Examining the Effect of Reverse Worded Items on the Factor Structure of the Need for Cognition Scale , 2016, PloS one.

[19]  U. Bültmann,et al.  The Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work in cancer patients is related with work functioning, fatigue and depressive symptoms: a validation study , 2015, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[20]  S. Sereika,et al.  Patterns of change in cognitive function with anastrozole therapy , 2015, Cancer.

[21]  W. Zwart,et al.  Cognitive effects of endocrine therapy for breast cancer: keep calm and carry on? , 2015, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Hunter Gehlbach.  Seven Survey Sins , 2015 .

[23]  Francis Guillemin,et al.  A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  Andy S. K. Cheng,et al.  Validation of the Chinese Version of the Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21 in Breast Cancer Survivors , 2015, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[26]  Juliana de Lima Lopes Rn,et al.  Experts for Validation Studies in Nursing: New Proposal and Selection Criteria , 2015 .

[27]  S. Schagen,et al.  Systemically Treated Breast Cancer Patients and Controls: An Evaluation of the Presence of Noncredible Performance , 2014, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[28]  M. Feuerstein,et al.  Brief self-report measure of work-related cognitive limitations in breast cancer survivors , 2013, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[29]  Wei Pan,et al.  Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio , 2012 .

[30]  N. M. C. Alexandre,et al.  Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas , 2011 .

[31]  D. Rubio,et al.  Objectifying Content Validity: Conducting a Content Validity Study in Social Work Research , 2003 .

[32]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. , 2000, Spine.

[33]  H. Thornton-Jones,et al.  Cancer Registry data. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[34]  L. A. Teixeira,et al.  Breast cancer in Brazil: medicine and public health in 20th century , 2020 .

[35]  Mônica Lima,et al.  O retorno ao trabalho de mulheres após a experiência do câncer de mama: uma metassíntese , 2020 .

[36]  T. Chianca,et al.  THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS FOR THE CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF INSTRUMENTS IN NURSING , 2018 .

[37]  F. Vijver,et al.  Measurement and Monitoring Youth Development Indicators from a Comparative Perspective , 2018 .

[38]  D. Eignor.  The standards for educational and psychological testing. , 2013 .

[39]  E. Feuer,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 , 2006 .

[40]  Rascon.  [The National Cancer Institute]. , 1953, Boletin cultural e informativo - Consejo General de Colegios Medicos de Espana.