Recognition of incidentally learned visual search arrays is supported by fixational eye movements.

Repeated encounter of abstract target-distractor letter arrangements leads to improved visual search for such displays. This contextual-cueing effect is attributed to incidental learning of display configurations. Whether observers can consciously access the memory underlying the cueing effect is still a controversial issue. The current study uses a novel recognition task and eyetracking to tackle this question. Experiment 1 investigated observers' ability to recognize or "generate" the display quadrant of the target in a previous search array when the target was now substituted by distractor element as well as where observers' eye fixations would fall while they freely viewed the recognition display, examining the link between the fixation pattern and explicit recognition judgments. Experiment 2 tested whether eye fixations would serve a critical role for explicit retrieval from context memory. Experiment 3 asked whether eye fixations of the target region are critical for context-based facilitation of search reaction times to manifest. The results revealed longer fixational dwell times in the target quadrant for learned relative to foil displays. Further, explicit recognition was enhanced, and above chance level, when observers were made to fixate the target quadrant as compared to when they were prevented from doing so. However, the manifestation of contextual cueing of visual search did itself not require fixations of the target quadrant. Moreover, contextual-cueing of search reaction times was significantly correlated with both fixational dwell times and observers' explicit generation performance. The results argue in favor of contextual cueing of visual search being the result of a single, explicit, memory system, though it could nevertheless receive support from separable-automatic versus controlled-retrieval processes. Fixational eye movements, that is, the directed overt allocation of visual attention, provide an interface between these processes in context cueing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  Kevin J. Hawley,et al.  Contribution of perceptual fluency to recognition judgments. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  B. Newell,et al.  Degraded conditions: Confounds in the study of decision making , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[4]  L. Stark,et al.  Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. , 1971, Vision research.

[5]  J. Henderson,et al.  Taking a new look at looking at nothing , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Medial temporal lobe-dependent repetition suppression and enhancement due to implicit vs. explicit processing of individual repeated search displays , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[10]  N. Cohen,et al.  Amnesia is a Deficit in Relational Memory , 2000, Psychological science.

[11]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Fixation-dependent memory for natural scenes: an experimental test of scanpath theory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  L. Squire,et al.  Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus , 2001, Hippocampus.

[13]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance The Nesting of Search Contexts Within Natural Scenes : Evidence From Contextual Cuing , 2010 .

[14]  D. Shanks,et al.  Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  Deborah E. Hannula,et al.  The Eyes Know , 2012, Psychological science.

[16]  Frank Renkewitz,et al.  Memory indexing: a novel method for tracing memory processes in complex cognitive tasks. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Deborah E. Hannula,et al.  The Eyes Have It: Hippocampal Activity Predicts Expression of Memory in Eye Movements , 2009, Neuron.

[18]  Miguel A. Vadillo,et al.  Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  S. Klein,et al.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[21]  Jeffrey S. Johnson,et al.  Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[23]  M. Chun,et al.  Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[25]  M. Johansson,et al.  Look Here, Eye Movements Play a Functional Role in Memory Retrieval , 2014, Psychological science.

[26]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing of visual attention , 2022 .

[27]  Thomas Geyer,et al.  Predictive visual search: Role of environmental regularities in the learning of context cues , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[28]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  William L. Gross,et al.  Hippocampal differentiation without recognition: an fMRI analysis of the contextual cueing task. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[30]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Zhuanghua Shi,et al.  Invariant spatial context is learned but not retrieved in gaze-contingent tunnel-view search. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Implicit learning increases preference for predictive visual display , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[33]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  A. Kramer,et al.  Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  E. Tulving How many memory systems are there , 1985 .

[37]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Investigating implicit statistical learning mechanisms through contextual cueing , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Gail M. Rosenbaum,et al.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  C. Li,et al.  Oculomotor correlates of context-guided learning in visual search , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Ben Colagiuri,et al.  Contextual cuing as a form of nonconscious learning: Theoretical and empirical analysis in large and very large samples , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  M. Chun,et al.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  Ken A Paller,et al.  What makes recognition without awareness appear to be elusive? Strategic factors that influence the accuracy of guesses. , 2010, Learning & memory.

[44]  Thomas Geyer,et al.  Awareness in contextual cueing of visual search as measured with concurrent access- and phenomenal-consciousness tasks. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[45]  M. Chun,et al.  Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context , 2002 .

[46]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Accurate forced-choice recognition without awareness of memory retrieval. , 2008, Learning & memory.

[47]  Thomas Geyer,et al.  Sleep-Effects on Implicit and Explicit Memory in Repeated Visual Search , 2013, PloS one.

[48]  Thomas Schmidt,et al.  Criteria for unconscious cognition: Three types of dissociation , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  David R Shanks,et al.  Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[50]  S. Hanslmayr,et al.  Rapid Memory Reactivation Revealed by Oscillatory Entrainment , 2012, Current Biology.