Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data

Article history: Received October 2, 2012 Received in Revised Format March 18, 2013 Accepted March 20, 2013 Available online March 23 2013 Selection of material for a specific engineering component, which plays a significant role in its design and proper functioning, is often treated as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem where the most suitable material is to be chosen based on a given set of conflicting criteria. For solving these MCDM problems, the designers do not generally know what should be the optimal number of criteria required for arriving at the best decisive action. Those criteria should be independent to each other and their number should usually limit to seven plus or minus two. In this paper, five material selection problems are solved using three common MCDM techniques to demonstrate the effect of number of criteria on the final rankings of the material alternatives. It is interesting to observe that the choices of the best suited materials solely depend on the criterion having the maximum priority value. It is also found that among the three MCDM methods, the ranking performance of VIKOR (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje) method is the best. © 2013 Growing Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  A. Thakker,et al.  A novel approach to materials selection strategy case study: Wave energy extraction impulse turbine blade , 2008 .

[2]  K. L. Edwards,et al.  Selecting materials for optimum use in engineering components , 2005 .

[3]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Material selection using preferential ranking methods , 2012 .

[4]  Ali Jahan,et al.  Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR , 2011 .

[5]  Halil Çalışkan,et al.  Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods , 2013 .

[6]  João Paulo Davim,et al.  A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method , 2008 .

[7]  A. Abedian,et al.  A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: Combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method , 2007 .

[8]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods , 2011 .

[9]  An-Hua Peng,et al.  Material selection using PROMETHEE combined with analytic network process under hybrid environment , 2013 .

[10]  Ali Shanian,et al.  A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making , 2006 .

[11]  Carlo Cavallini,et al.  Integral aided method for material selection based on quality function deployment and comprehensive VIKOR algorithm , 2013 .

[12]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[13]  R. V. Rao,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection , 2010 .

[14]  Dong-Hyun Jee,et al.  A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory , 2000 .

[15]  M. K. Rathod,et al.  A methodological concept for phase change material selection based on multiple criteria decision analysis with and without fuzzy environment , 2011 .

[16]  Ali Jahan,et al.  A target-based normalization technique for materials selection , 2012 .

[17]  F. Findik,et al.  Materials selection for lighter wagon design with a weighted property index method , 2012 .

[18]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component , 2012 .

[19]  Rahul Vaish,et al.  Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach , 2012 .

[20]  M. Yurdakul,et al.  Application of correlation test to criteria selection for multi criteria decision making (MCDM) models , 2009 .

[21]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Applications of utility concept and desirability function for materials selection , 2013 .

[22]  Ali Shanian,et al.  A non-compensatory compromised solution for material selection of bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) using ELECTRE IV , 2006 .

[23]  A. Abedian,et al.  Introducing a novel method for materials selection in mechanical design using Z-transformation in statistics for normalization of material properties , 2009 .

[24]  David L. Olson,et al.  Decision Aids for Selection Problems , 1995 .

[25]  S. M. Sapuan,et al.  A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection , 2011, Materials & Design.

[26]  A. Milani,et al.  The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection , 2005 .

[27]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method , 2008 .

[28]  Yuanpei Lan,et al.  A new material selection approach using PROMETHEE method , 2011, Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Electronic & Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology.

[29]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods , 2009 .

[30]  Ali Shanian,et al.  TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 2006 .

[31]  T. Saaty,et al.  Why the magic number seven plus or minus two , 2003 .

[32]  S. M. Sapuan,et al.  Material screening and choosing methods: A review , 2010 .