Is pitch perception and discrimination of vowels language-dependent and influenced by the vowels spectral properties? Daniel Pape

Pitch discrimination and accuracy has been found to depend on different factors. However, little work has been done (1) on the cross-linguistic influence of the listeners’ native language and (2) on the influence of the spectral structure on the pitch perception of vowels as well as (3) cross-linguistic differences regarding different levels of muscial education. If differences in pitch discrimination between different language families exist this would be a crucial knowledge in the design and failure-safe application of auditory displays driven by pitch differences in speech control. Therefore the current study examines pitch discrimination of German vowels with a similar vowel height differing in rounding and tenseness for (1) native German listeners and (2) native Catalan listeners. Significant differences in the sensitivity of pitch perception between these two languages were found. Catalan listeners, independent of their musical education, were mostly insensitive to even large pitch differences in the vowels to be judged. The accuracy of pitch judgements for German listeners were significantly different for musically educated listeners in comparison to musically uneducated listeners. Further, both languages show a significant pitch difference for rounded vowels compared to the unrounded vowels. The current study provides evidence that pitch discrimination is language-dependent, at least partially.

[1]  B. Moore.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[2]  D. Schön,et al.  The music of speech: music training facilitates pitch processing in both music and language. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[3]  D. Whalen,et al.  The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels , 1995 .

[4]  Gerhard Stoll,et al.  Pitch of vowels: Experimental and theoretical investigation of its dependence on vowel quality , 1984, Speech Commun..

[5]  Oliver Niebuhr,et al.  Intrinsic Pitch in Opening and Closing Diphthongs of German , 2004 .

[6]  C A Fowler,et al.  Intrinsicf0 differences in spoken and sung vowels and their perception by listeners , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  The effect of musicianship on pitch memory in performance matched groups , 2003, Neuroreport.

[8]  H. Traunmüller.  Some aspects of the sound of speech sounds , 1987 .

[9]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[10]  SPECTRAL·PITCH PATTERN A C'oncept Representing the Tonal Features of Sounds , 1982 .

[11]  W. S. Wang,et al.  Psychophysical pitch biases related to vowel quality, intensity difference, and sequential order. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Gilbert A. Soulodre,et al.  Evaluation of Objective Loudness Meters , 2004 .

[13]  L. Kishon-Rabin,et al.  Pitch Discrimination: Are Professional Musicians Better than Non-Musicians? , 2001, Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology.

[14]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .

[15]  G. Fant,et al.  Two-formant Models, Pitch and Vowel Perception , 1975 .

[16]  T. Rossing,et al.  Effects of signal envelope on the pitch of short complex tones. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  E. Terhardt,et al.  Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals , 1982 .

[18]  D. Klatt,et al.  Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: implications for models of pitch perception. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.