Response properties of whisker-associated trigeminothalamic neurons in rat nucleus principalis.

Nucleus principalis (PrV) of the brain stem trigeminal complex mediates the processing and transfer of low-threshold mechanoreceptor input en route to the ventroposterior medial nucleus of the thalamus (VPM). In rats, this includes tactile information relayed from the large facial whiskers via primary afferent fibers originating in the trigeminal ganglion (NV). Here we describe the responses of antidromically identified VPM-projecting PrV neurons (n = 72) to controlled ramp-and-hold deflections of whiskers. For comparison, we also recorded the responses of 64 NV neurons under identical experimental and stimulus conditions. Both PrV and NV neurons responded transiently to stimulus onset (ON) and offset (OFF), and the majority of both populations also displayed sustained, or tonic, responses throughout the plateau phase of the stimulus (75% of NV cells and 93% of PrV cells). Average ON and OFF response magnitudes were similar between the two populations. In both NV and PrV, cells were highly sensitive to the direction of whisker deflection. Directional tuning was slightly but significantly greater in NV, suggesting that PrV neurons integrate inputs from NV cells differing in their preferred directions. Receptive fields of PrV neurons were typically dominated by a "principal" whisker (PW), whose evoked responses were on average threefold larger than those elicited by any given adjacent whisker (AW; n = 197). However, of the 65 PrV cells for which data from at least two AWs were obtained, most (89%) displayed statistically significant ON responses to deflections of one or more AWs. AW response latencies were 2.7 +/- 3.8 (SD) ms longer than those of their corresponding PWs, with an inner quartile latency difference of 1-4 ms (+/-25% of median). The range in latency differences suggests that some adjacent whisker responses arise within PrV itself, whereas others have a longer, multi-synaptic origin, possibly via the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Overall, our findings reveal that the stimulus features encoded by primary afferent neurons are reflected in the responses of VPM-projecting PrV neurons, and that significant convergence of information from multiple whiskers occurs at the first synaptic station in the whisker-to-barrel pathway.

[1]  C. L. Kwan,et al.  C-fiber depletion alters response properties of neurons in trigeminal nucleus principalis. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  H. Killackey,et al.  Receptive-field properties of rat ventral posterior medial neurons before and after selective kainic acid lesions of the trigeminal brain stem complex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  E Ahissar,et al.  Temporal frequency of whisker movement. I. Representations in brain stem and thalamus. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  B. Stein,et al.  The organization of trigeminotectal and trigeminothalamic neurons in rodents: A double‐labeling study with fluorescent dyes , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  M. Deschenes,et al.  Single- and Multi-Whisker Channels in the Ascending Projections from the Principal Trigeminal Nucleus in the Rat , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  D J Simons,et al.  OFF response transformations in the whisker/barrel system. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  L. Sikich,et al.  Effect of a uniform partial denervation of the periphery on the peripheral and central vibrissal system in guinea pigs , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Simons,et al.  Inhibition Suppresses Transmission of Tonic Vibrissa-Evoked Activity in the Rat Ventrobasal Thalamus , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Simons Temporal and spatial integration in the rat SI vibrissa cortex. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Some aspects of the functional organization of the cortex of the postcentral gyrus of the monkey: a correlation of findings obtained in a single unit analysis with cytoarchitecture. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[11]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Cell structure and response properties in the trigeminal subnucleus oralis. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[12]  D. Simons,et al.  Responses of rat trigeminal ganglion neurons to movements of vibrissae in different directions. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[13]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  THE FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF VENTROBASAL THALAMIC NEURONSSTUDIED IN UNANESTHETIZED MONKEYS. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  F. Ebner,et al.  Modulation of receptive field properties of thalamic somatosensory neurons by the depth of anesthesia. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  M F Jacquin,et al.  Peripheral and central predictors of whisker afferent morphology in the rat brainstem , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[17]  J. Dörfl The musculature of the mystacial vibrissae of the white mouse. , 1982, Journal of anatomy.

[18]  D. Simons,et al.  High responsiveness and direction sensitivity of neurons in the rat thalamic reticular nucleus to vibrissa deflections. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  D. Bowsher,et al.  Terminal distribution of primary afferent trigeminal fibers in the rat. , 1962, Experimental neurology.

[20]  H. Killackey,et al.  Vibrissae representation in subcortical trigeminal centers of the neonatal rat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  D. Simons,et al.  Coding of deflection velocity and amplitude by whisker primary afferent neurons: implications for higher level processing. , 2000, Somatosensory & motor research.

[22]  K. Gottschaldt,et al.  Merkel cell receptors: structure and transducer function. , 1981, Science.

[23]  M Armstrong-James,et al.  Thalamo‐cortical processing of vibrissal information in the rat. II. Spatiotemporal convergence in the thalamic ventroposterior medial nucleus (VPm) and its relevance to generation of receptive fields of S1 cortical “Barrel” neurones , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  M F Jacquin,et al.  Differential Foci and Synaptic Organization of the Principal and Spinal Trigeminal Projections to the Thalamus in the Rat , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  R S Erzurumlu,et al.  Electrophysiological properties and synaptic responses of cells in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus of postnatal rats. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  R. Guillery,et al.  Paying attention to the thalamic reticular nucleus , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  A. Iggo,et al.  Functional characteristics of mechanoreceptors in sinus hair follicles of the cat , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  J. M. Gibson,et al.  Quantitative studies of stimulus coding in first-order vibrissa afferents of rats. 2. Adaptation and coding of stimulus parameters. , 1983, Somatosensory research.

[29]  M F Jacquin,et al.  Intersubnuclear connections within the rat trigeminal brainstem complex. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[30]  D. Simons,et al.  Responses of barrel cortex neurons in awake rats and effects of urethane anesthesia , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  J M Gibson,et al.  Quantitative studies of stimulus coding in first-order vibrissa afferents of rats. 1. Receptive field properties and threshold distributions. , 1983, Somatosensory research.

[32]  C. Matute,et al.  Gamma-aminobutyric acid-immunoreactive neurons in the rat trigeminal nuclei , 2004, Histochemistry.

[33]  F. Ebner,et al.  The role of GABA-mediated inhibition in the rat ventral posterior medial thalamus. II. Differential effects of GABAA and GABAB receptor antagonists on responses of VPM neurons. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Haruhide Hayashi,et al.  Distributions of vibrissae afferent fiber collaterals in the trigeminal nuclei as revealed by intra-axonal injection of horseradish peroxidase , 1980, Brain Research.

[35]  Thomas A. Woolsey,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic correlates of the vibrissae in the medullary trigeminal complex of the mouse , 1984, Brain Research.

[36]  N. Wittenburg,et al.  Transformation from temporal to rate coding in a somatosensory thalamocortical pathway , 2022 .

[37]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Structure and function of barrel 'precursor' cells in trigeminal nucleus principalis. , 1988, Brain research.

[38]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Morphology, response properties, and collateral projections of trigeminothalamic neurons in brainstem subnucleus interpolaris of rat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  H. Killackey,et al.  The role of the principal sensory nucleus in central trigeminal pattern formation. , 1985, Brain research.

[40]  R L Smith,et al.  The ascending fiber projections from the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus in the rat , 1973, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  D. Simons Neuronal Integration in the Somatosensory Whisker/Barrel Cortex , 1995 .

[42]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Structure-function relationships in rat brain stem subnucleus interpolaris. VIII. Cortical inputs. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  M. Deschenes,et al.  Thalamic projections from the whisker‐sensitive regions of the spinal trigeminal complex in the rat , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[44]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Structure‐function relationships in rat brainstem subnucleus interpolaris: IV. Projection neurons , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[45]  J. Baizer Receptive field properties of V3 neurons in monkey. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[46]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Trigeminal structure-function relationships: a reevaluation based on long-range staining of a large sample of brainstem a beta fibers. , 1995, Somatosensory & motor research.

[47]  S. Buffer,et al.  Barreloids in adult rat thalamus: Three‐dimensional architecture and relationship to somatosensory cortical barrels , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[48]  M. Peschanski,et al.  Trigeminal afferents to the diencephalon in the rat , 1984, Neuroscience.

[49]  H. Killackey,et al.  Differential organization of thalamic projection cells in the brain stem trigeminal complex of the rat , 1980, Brain Research.

[50]  T. Woolsey,et al.  Acute whisker removal reduces neuronal activity in barrels of mouse sml cortex , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[51]  L. Pellegrino,et al.  stereotaxic atlas of the rat brain , 1967 .

[52]  M F Jacquin,et al.  Morphology and topography of identified primary afferents in trigeminal subnuclei principalis and oralis. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  D. Simons Multi-whisker stimulation and its effects on vibrissa units in rat Sml barrel cortex , 1983, Brain Research.

[54]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Principalis- or parabrachial-projecting spinal trigeminal neurons do not stain for GABA or GAD. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[55]  M. Shipley,et al.  Response characteristics of single units in the rat's trigeminal nuclei to vibrissa displacements. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  J. Kaas,et al.  Regional segregation of neurons responding to quickly adapting, slowly adapting, deep and pacinian receptors within thalamic ventroposterior lateral and ventroposterior inferior nuclei in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) , 1981, Neuroscience.

[57]  F. Ebner,et al.  The role of GABA-mediated inhibition in the rat ventral posterior medial thalamus. I. Assessment of receptive field changes following thalamic reticular nucleus lesions. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  W. Welker,et al.  Coding of somatic sensory input by vibrissae neurons in the rat's trigeminal ganglion. , 1969, Brain research.

[59]  D J Simons,et al.  Thalamocortical response transformations in simulated whisker barrels , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[60]  A. Nuñez,et al.  In vitro electrophysiological properties of rat dorsal column nuclei neurons , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[61]  H. Killackey,et al.  Thalamic processing of vibrissal information in the rat. I. Afferent input to the medial ventral posterior and posterior nuclei , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[62]  P. Ma The barrelettes—architectonic vibrissal representations in the brainstem trigeminal complex of the mouse. Normal structural organization , 1991 .

[63]  Y. Bae,et al.  Identification of signal substances in synapses made between primary afferents and their associated axon terminals in the rat trigeminal sensory nuclei , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[64]  D. Simons,et al.  Thalamocortical response transformation in the rat vibrissa/barrel system. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  B. Munger,et al.  A comparative light microscopic analysis of the sensory innervation of the mystacial pad. I. Innervation of vibrissal follicle‐sinus complexes , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[66]  K. Takahashi,et al.  Slow and fast groups of pyramidal tract cells and their respective membrane properties. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.