Applying a Knowledge Audit Strategy for Public Corporate Boards

Government boards are being asked to provide more oversight in creating and protecting public value. Much attention has been focused on the implementation of policies, processes and structures aimed at assisting directors with their new role. However, several surveys are reporting that they still do not have the necessary information and knowledge. While many studies have provided valuable insights into information-related issues, there remains a strong need for comprehensive guidelines that can help to determine specific information needs, problems, and solutions. The objective of this paper is to present the roadmap for an action research project that is set to start in 2016. It intends to validate the use of knowledge audit methodology in the context of public boards. The framework should help public organizations and their boards to determine a knowledge strategy that capitalizes on both tacit and explicit knowledge and on communication technologies.

[1]  Chi Fai Cheung,et al.  Auditing and Mapping the Knowledge Assets of Business Processes - An Empirical Study , 2007, KSEM.

[2]  Dorothy Williams,et al.  Reconsidering the Knowledge Audit Process: Methodological Revisions in Practice , 2013 .

[3]  Charles L. Citroen,et al.  The role of information in strategic decision-making , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[4]  Tom Butler,et al.  Designing a core IT artefact for Knowledge Management Systems using participatory action research in a government and a non-government organisation , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Daniel Johanson Corporate governance and board accounts: exploring a neglected interface between boards of directors and management , 2008 .

[6]  M. Pimbert,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Action Research , 2008 .

[7]  Pieter-Jan Bezemer,et al.  An Observational Analysis of the Impact of Board Dynamics and Directors' Participation on Perceived Board Effectiveness , 2015 .

[8]  J. Brown The Demythification of the Board of Directors , 2014 .

[9]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  Investigating the Relationship between Board Characteristics and Board Information , 2007 .

[10]  F. Bosch,et al.  Boards of Directors' Contribution to Strategy: A Literature Review and Research Agenda , 2009 .

[11]  K. Dirks,et al.  Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation , 2013 .

[12]  Mario Barcelo-Valenzuela,et al.  A Model and Methodology to Knowledge Auditing Considering Core Processes , 2007 .

[13]  A. Antonova,et al.  Knowledge audit concepts, processes and practice , 2009 .

[14]  K. Verhoest,et al.  Corporate governance vs. government governance: translation or adaptation? , 2007 .

[15]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research , 2006 .

[16]  J. Liebowitz,et al.  The knowledge audit , 2000 .

[17]  Natalie Elms,et al.  The importance of group-fit in new director selection , 2015 .

[18]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[19]  Dunstan Newman,et al.  Learning and knowledge: a dream or nightmare for employees , 2015 .

[20]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .