In this paper we develop a framework for competition of future operators likely to operate in a mixed commons/property-rights regime under the regulation of a spectrum policy server (SPS). The operators dynamically compete for customers as well as portions of available spectrum. The operators are charged by the SPS for the amount of bandwidth they use in their services. Through demand responsive pricing, the operators try to come up with convincing service offers for the customers, while trying to maximize their profits. We first consider a single-user system as an illustrative example. We formulate the competition between the operators as a non-cooperative game and propose an SPS-based iterative bidding scheme that results in Nash equilibrium of the game. Numerical results suggest that, competition increases the user's (customer's) acceptance probability of the offered service, while reducing the profits achieved by the operators. It is also observed that as the cost of unit bandwidth increases relative to the cost of unit infrastructure (fixed cost), the operator with superior technology (higher fixed cost) becomes more competitive. We then extend the framework to a multiuser setting where the operators are competing for a number of users at once. We propose an SPS-based bandwidth allocation scheme in which the SPS optimally allocates bandwidth portions for each user-operator session to maximize its overall expected revenue resulting from the operator payments. Comparison of the performance of this scheme to one in which the bandwidth is equally shared between the user-operator pairs reveals that such an SPS-based scheme improves the user acceptance probabilities and the bandwidth utilization in multiuser systems
[1]
S. Merrill Weiss,et al.
New Measurements and Predictions of UHF Television Receiver Local Oscillator Radiation Interference
,
2003
.
[2]
Danijela Cabric,et al.
White paper: Corvus: A cognitive radio approach for usage of virtual unlicensed spectrum
,
2004
.
[3]
Max H. M. Costa,et al.
Writing on dirty paper
,
1983,
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.
[4]
J.E. Mazo,et al.
Digital communications
,
1985,
Proceedings of the IEEE.
[5]
Joseph Mitola,et al.
Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal
,
1999,
IEEE Wirel. Commun..
[6]
M. Hata,et al.
Empirical formula for propagation loss in land mobile radio services
,
1980,
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.
[7]
Niels Kang Hoven.
On the feasibility of cognitive radio
,
2005
.
[8]
R.W. Brodersen,et al.
Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios
,
2004,
Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..
[9]
Anant Sahai,et al.
Some Fundamental Limits on Cognitive Radio
,
2004
.